VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Hawaii
    Search Comp PM
    For those of you with newer systems, have you noticed a decrease in encoding times, or does software like Tmpgenc run at the same speed?

    I'm pricing out a new AMD XP based system, partially to be able to encode at faster rates. I'm satisfied with avi file encoding, but it just takes too long, when I render the final project in Tmpgenc.

    My current system is based on a 1.1ghz AMD Thunderbird, with 1024MB of RAM. It's not slow by any means, but I could easily be happy with something faster.
    Quote Quote  
  2. If all other factors remain equal (source material, encoding software, encoder settings, etc) more CPU muscle results in faster encoding. Notice that when you run an encoder (i.e. tmpgenc) at highest priority, your CPU usage is pegged at 99-100%.
    As Churchill famously predicted when Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming peace in his time: "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war."
    Quote Quote  
  3. I just upgraded to a P4 running at 1.5GHz. I like the pentium because of its fast processing of math, which is 100% of what encoding is.

    Running Tmpgenc, I can do 1 hour VCD encoding in 50 minutes, and 1 hour of SVCD encoding in 1 hour and 45 minutes. I don't think any AMD processor can beat that speed performance. With a 2.2GHz CPU, it would shave of even more time.
    Quote Quote  
  4. If I can beat your speed??

    YES

    Try 2xMP1900 AMD in TMPGEnc. I encode SVCD faster than realtime, with high settings.
    Quote Quote  
  5. :)

    Yes, multiple processors will do the trick.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Georgia (U.S.)
    Search Comp PM
    Mirror_Image,

    How do you set TMPGEnc to be the highest priority (I'm guessing we're talking about threads, right)?


    skittelsen,

    50 minutes? I have a P4 2.0GHz and it still takes me about 2 hours for a good 45-minute encode. Are you not using any filters at all? Do you frameserve or not? How is my processing time so much larger than yours? Can you give me some specifics on your encoding process?


    Thanks!!
    "They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction."

    --Janet Reno
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    los angeles
    Search Comp PM
    I have an AMD 1700+, with the super cheap ecsk7s5a mobo. I laso have 128 megs of DDR ram running on winxp Pro. The entire dvd2svcd, encoding process, takes me 5 hours. From ripping, to the 2-pass tmpgenc vbr encode. I get great results, and couldnt ask for more considering my last system threatened me with 21 hours, at a low rate of constant quality (cq).
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by gte901r
    How do you set TMPGEnc to be the highest priority?
    option...task priority
    As Churchill famously predicted when Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming peace in his time: "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war."
    Quote Quote  
  9. So what about the encoding process entirely? The moment TMPEG is started and it stops. I heard that dual systems make it faster even with filters on because the second cpu is handling the filter process. Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks.
    Quote Quote  
  10. heard that dual systems make it faster even with filters on because the second cpu is handling the filter process.
    No, dual-CPU systems run poorly with filters on, probably because the second CPU is handlking the filter process. I ran some tests on a dual 866 MHZ P3. With no filters, encoding speed was about 1.95 times faster with dual CPUs compared to the same encode on a single CPU. With the noise reduction filter on, the dual CPU encode was about 1.3 times faster than the same encode with a single CPU.

    Tim
    Quote Quote  
  11. Question -- mirror_image
    or whomever!

    When setting the task priority there is several options in the pulldown menu. ie(normal when active, high when idle, higest when inactive etc..), Im assuming that if Im setting it a night before bed I should set it to highest priority when inactive> This correct?
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!