For those of you with newer systems, have you noticed a decrease in encoding times, or does software like Tmpgenc run at the same speed?
I'm pricing out a new AMD XP based system, partially to be able to encode at faster rates. I'm satisfied with avi file encoding, but it just takes too long, when I render the final project in Tmpgenc.
My current system is based on a 1.1ghz AMD Thunderbird, with 1024MB of RAM. It's not slow by any means, but I could easily be happy with something faster.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
-
If all other factors remain equal (source material, encoding software, encoder settings, etc) more CPU muscle results in faster encoding. Notice that when you run an encoder (i.e. tmpgenc) at highest priority, your CPU usage is pegged at 99-100%.
As Churchill famously predicted when Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming peace in his time: "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war." -
I just upgraded to a P4 running at 1.5GHz. I like the pentium because of its fast processing of math, which is 100% of what encoding is.
Running Tmpgenc, I can do 1 hour VCD encoding in 50 minutes, and 1 hour of SVCD encoding in 1 hour and 45 minutes. I don't think any AMD processor can beat that speed performance. With a 2.2GHz CPU, it would shave of even more time. -
If I can beat your speed??
YES
Try 2xMP1900 AMD in TMPGEnc. I encode SVCD faster than realtime, with high settings. -
Mirror_Image,
How do you set TMPGEnc to be the highest priority (I'm guessing we're talking about threads, right)?
skittelsen,
50 minutes? I have a P4 2.0GHz and it still takes me about 2 hours for a good 45-minute encode. Are you not using any filters at all? Do you frameserve or not? How is my processing time so much larger than yours? Can you give me some specifics on your encoding process?
Thanks!!"They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction."
--Janet Reno -
I have an AMD 1700+, with the super cheap ecsk7s5a mobo. I laso have 128 megs of DDR ram running on winxp Pro. The entire dvd2svcd, encoding process, takes me 5 hours. From ripping, to the 2-pass tmpgenc vbr encode. I get great results, and couldnt ask for more considering my last system threatened me with 21 hours, at a low rate of constant quality (cq).
-
Originally Posted by gte901rAs Churchill famously predicted when Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming peace in his time: "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war."
-
So what about the encoding process entirely? The moment TMPEG is started and it stops. I heard that dual systems make it faster even with filters on because the second cpu is handling the filter process. Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks.
-
heard that dual systems make it faster even with filters on because the second cpu is handling the filter process.
Tim -
Question -- mirror_image
or whomever!
When setting the task priority there is several options in the pulldown menu. ie(normal when active, high when idle, higest when inactive etc..), Im assuming that if Im setting it a night before bed I should set it to highest priority when inactive> This correct?
Similar Threads
-
[FFmpeg] Up encoding speed for wmv's
By Klagar in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 24th Jan 2011, 13:00 -
How do I speed up my video to 10X speed?
By mileena in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 9Last Post: 27th Aug 2010, 13:24 -
decreasing encoding speed with mencoder (mplayer)
By sammy82 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 1st Apr 2010, 23:58 -
can you speed up encoding with ripbot x264
By zerocoool in forum Video ConversionReplies: 6Last Post: 26th May 2008, 21:07 -
Burning speed vs. disc speed
By coody in forum DVD RippingReplies: 5Last Post: 26th May 2008, 02:41