VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. Member blinky88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    I have been searching for hours and have not been able to come up with a solution, help would really be appreciated.
    Cheers from downunder.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Quote Quote  
  3. What is wrong with ffmpeg? https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encoding%20VBR%20%28Variable%20Bit%20Rate%29%20mp3%20audio

    ffmpeg -i %1 -codec:a libmp3lame -q:a 2 -ac 2 %1.mp3
    Quote Quote  
  4. MeGUI's audio converter will also do it.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member PuzZLeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Search Comp PM
    I too say MeGUI (and LAME) is simple enough.
    I hate VHS. I always did.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by PuzZLeR View Post
    I too say MeGUI (and LAME) is simple enough.
    Nothing is simpler than ffmpeg and one comand line... two programs are not simpler than one.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    ®Inside My Avatar™© U.S.
    Search Comp PM
    two programs are not simpler than one
    That is kind of like saying using EAC with lame or flac is more complicated because you are using 3 programs......
    When one is just the frontend and uses lame or flac to encode.

    You can use one program on the front that uses more than one other program or software but that does not make
    more complicated or less "simpler" to use.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member PuzZLeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by pandy View Post
    Originally Posted by PuzZLeR View Post
    I too say MeGUI (and LAME) is simple enough.
    Nothing is simpler than ffmpeg and one comand line... two programs are not simpler than one.
    The expression "simple enough" is not synonymous with "simpler".

    Regardless, I agree with you in the point of view of computational complexity, but if I can avoid having to write any command line by using a front end (via the second program) I find that simpler in terms of a point-click-keystroke logistical sequence.

    Besides, aren't front ends, or GUIs, for CLI-based programs designed to make your life simpler?
    I hate VHS. I always did.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Originally Posted by Noahtuck View Post
    two programs are not simpler than one
    That is kind of like saying using EAC with lame or flac is more complicated because you are using 3 programs......
    When one is just the frontend and uses lame or flac to encode.

    You can use one program on the front that uses more than one other program or software but that does not make
    more complicated or less "simpler" to use.
    Example not fair as EAC is ripper with encode functionality - where conversion between formats is not EAC task.
    As i understand idea behind example then i don't understand why use two programs instead one where this program provide probably highest possible quality (SoX resampler if required, all LAME options, decent AC3 decoder) in one binary.
    But OK as principle - i was quite curious why bother with possible problems related to pipe, formats to exchange data etc. but OK and it is up to topic author.

    Originally Posted by PuzZLeR View Post
    Originally Posted by pandy View Post
    Originally Posted by PuzZLeR View Post
    I too say MeGUI (and LAME) is simple enough.
    Nothing is simpler than ffmpeg and one comand line... two programs are not simpler than one.
    The expression "simple enough" is not synonymous with "simpler".

    Regardless, I agree with you in the point of view of computational complexity, but if I can avoid having to write any command line by using a front end (via the second program) I find that simpler in terms of a point-click-keystroke logistical sequence.

    Besides, aren't front ends, or GUIs, for CLI-based programs designed to make your life simpler?
    Fair point and my mistake - simpler doesn't mean simplest, simple enough is not simpler - blame me not being native English.
    AFAIR there is at least few GUI's for FFMPEG - bot sure how they follow ffmpeg changes but IMHO copy + paste in notepad is not so difficult task especially that this batch can be used in GUI also.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member PuzZLeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Yes, a Notepad template, and cut and paste, makes much of the pain go away when using CLI based programs, especially when you use the program repetitively. I do this with AviSynth too (and sometimes Notepad feels like a frontend/GUI).
    I hate VHS. I always did.
    Quote Quote  
  12. Originally Posted by PuzZLeR View Post
    Yes, a Notepad template, and cut and paste, makes much of the pain go away when using CLI based programs, especially when you use the program repetitively. I do this with AviSynth too (and sometimes Notepad feels like a frontend/GUI).

    My point was that you can "drag & drop" on batch - thus not problem at all with semi GUI ffmpeg... from very simple script to very fancy - more or less similar functionality - funniest thing is that some people building in some xxxxbuilder GUI wrapper over ffmpeg and they want to have money or worse (adware/spyware/trojanware etc).

    http://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=957
    https://anaheimofmanheim.wordpress.com/2012/12/31/drag-and-drop-multiple-files-for-bat...eg-processing/
    http://pcloadletter.co.uk/2011/06/15/batch-ffmpeg-transcoding-script/
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!