Thanks lollo, difference is incredible. I need to try a comparison now between SOFT and AUTO modes with DNR off. When I tried it before I couldn't see anything as I toggled but will try a capture to verify. I don't know how AUTO is determined and nothing in the manual makes it clear.
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 39 of 39
Thread
-
-
-
QTGMC denoises by itself and is not easy to turn completely off this filtering, being essential part of the nice outcomes we all appreciate.
The preset "fast" is not recommended when QTGMC is used "alone", and useless for the purpose to avoid over processing when applying additional denoising step.
I generally use something like:
Code:QTGMC(preset="slow", matchpreset="slow", matchpreset2="slow", sourcematch=3, tr1=2, tr2=1, NoiseTR=2, sharpness=0.1) TemporalDegrain2(degrainTR=3)
Some useful old discussion here:
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/404164-Why-is-QTGMC-so-destructive-and-why-do-so-m...it#post2641895
https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/410894-Avoid-noise-reduction-with-QTGMC -
That's good to know, I've obviously been using some sample scripts incorrectly.
If I start with these settings, is it adequate to reduce the degrainTR settings from 3 to a lower value, or do we need to start throwing grainLevel,postFFT and postSigma settings into the mix? I much prefer to keep it as simple as possible. -
In general, TemporalDegrain2 works quite well with degrainTR=3, so start with that, and experiment lower values.
The post-processing options in TD2 are there to provide additional denoise, which is rarely required. For very bad sources with residual noise after TD2 you can try a spatial denoiser like KNLMeansCL, enabling it inside TD2 (with postFFT and postSigma) or in stand-alone mode (preferred, so you have full control of all parameters).
But, once more, I adhere to the concept "less is better", so be careful to do not over process your videos.
P.S.: remeber that QTGMC is only needed for interlaced sources. -
Yes all my sources are interlaced.
I've added a few other samples from a recent tape. Some sections of the tape are much better than others so I'm assuming this was recorded to VHS from a camcorder.
The TG2 noise reduction helps a bit on this but it seems the source is overly blurry. I'm sure sure how to describe this technical but if you had any assistance on these clips that could be useful to understand how I can improve. It just seems overly soft to begin with. -
A quick attempt on my side. The source is not the best, but I see some improvement with a basic processing.
Levels video 1 OK:
Levels video 2 OK:
Processing video 1:
video (cutted for upload limits): a_cutted.avi
comparison by side:
comparison with slider: https://imgsli.com/MzI0MzUw (a bit unfair, interlaced vs progressive)
Processing video 2:
video: b.avi
comparison by side:
comparison with slider: https://imgsli.com/MzI0MzUx (a bit unfair, interlaced vs progressive)
Filtering video 1:
Code:video_org=AviSource("VHS-TAPE1-Baling-4-00.09.11.019-00.09.16.842-seg1.avi") # cropping crop_left=16 # | rimozione esatta delle bande nere sinistra, sopra, destra e del disturbo sotto crop_top=8 # | 720-(16+10)x576-(8+4)=694x564 crop_right=10 crop_bottom=4 video_org_crop=video_org.crop(crop_left,crop_top,-crop_right,-crop_bottom) ### de-interlacing deinterlaced=video_org_crop.AssumeTFF().QTGMC(preset="slow", matchpreset="slow", matchpreset2="slow", sourcematch=3, tr1=2, tr2=1, NoiseTR=2, sharpness=0.1) ### convert to YV16 deinterlaced_yv16=deinterlaced.convertToYV16() ### denoising denoised_yv16=deinterlaced_yv16.TemporalDegrain2(degrainTR=3) ### convert to YUY2 denoised=denoised_yv16.convertToYUY2() ### convert to YV12 video_org_yv12=denoised.convertToYV12() ### sharpening sharpened_yv12=video_org_yv12.LSFmod(defaults="slow") ### convert to YUY2 with chroma from YUY2 color space sharpened=sharpened_yv12.convertToYUY2().MergeChroma(denoised) ### add borders video_rest=sharpened.addborders((crop_left+crop_right)/2-1,(crop_top+crop_bottom)/2,(crop_left+crop_right)/2+1,(crop_top+crop_bottom)/2) return(video_rest)
Code:# cropping crop_left=16 # | rimozione esatta delle bande nere sinistra, sopra, destra e del disturbo sotto crop_top=10 # | 720-(16+10)x576-(10+4)=694x562 crop_right=10 crop_bottom=4
-
Thanks for that. I was using very similar - TG2 and LSFMod albeit the fast mode. I'm using Staxrip so the conversions and mergechroma isn't something I specify (assume it happens behind the scenes).
Is the low quality source to be expected if this was recorded from some other device e.g. camcorder to VHS? -
Is the low quality source to be expected if this was recorded from some other device e.g. camcorder to VHS?
I'm using Staxrip so the conversions and mergechroma isn't something I specify (assume it happens behind the scenes).
You do not need any useless gui, for encoding just use:
Code:ffmpeg.exe -i <input>.avs -c:v libx264 -crf 17 -preset slow -aspect 4:3 -c:a aac -b:a 128k <output>.mp4
Similar Threads
-
VCR comparison Panasonic NV-FS200(AG 1980) VS Panasonic NV-HS1000
By JoseD in forum RestorationReplies: 32Last Post: 18th Apr 2016, 09:30 -
I would like to buy a VCR S-VHS Panasonic...can someone suggest me which of
By Giasan in forum RestorationReplies: 2Last Post: 12th Nov 2011, 17:50 -
I would like to buy one of these two VCR panasonic ...can someone suggest
By Giasan in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 12th Nov 2011, 11:41 -
Panasonic NV-HS1000 PAL VCR - any users
By Quasipal in forum RestorationReplies: 1Last Post: 11th Oct 2010, 07:18 -
Panasonic AG-1980 VCR and PAL vhs
By victoriabears in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 1st Jul 2009, 14:50