Last test I did was the HM ref encoder which was slightly better than x264 but extremely slow so I only tested on a short clip.
I tested DivxHEVC on a much longer clip and it was higher quality on some frames, lower quality on others, usually ones with a lot of action, on average it was worse than x264. I haven't tried x265 yet, is it any better?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
-
-
since x265 is steadily changing, you will have to try yourself,... a few days ago x265 did offer better quality than DivX265.
Side note: what does the vertical scale meassure? -
Vertical scale is SSIM.
I did try x265 but I couldn't get it to decode my input properly so it encodes a shape-shifting mess. At first I thought it was an OUTPUT decoding problem but then I realized the bitrates were unacceptably high for such a tiny resolution and such a high CRF.
It also sucks I can't encode lower than 320x240 resolution.
Similar Threads
-
[HEVC] x265.EXE: mingw builds
By El Heggunte in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2221Last Post: 9th Feb 2021, 01:18 -
x265 vs x264
By deadrats in forum Video ConversionReplies: 71Last Post: 10th Jan 2016, 06:14 -
[S.E.0.] x265 sucks ;-P
By El Heggunte in forum TestReplies: 8Last Post: 21st Jan 2014, 00:14 -
HEVC x265 Decoder
By enim in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 5Last Post: 19th Aug 2013, 12:58 -
MulticoreWare Annouces x265/HEVC Mission Statement
By enim in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 4Last Post: 9th Aug 2013, 22:09