Fastest DVDRipper 64bit DVD ripper with Nvidia Cuda encoding

[AndreL]

I have windows 7 64 bit with 2 9500 GT graphic cards with 32 cores.

Looking for a ripper that will take the processing off my CPU and use my cuda core. Wish I hand a i7 that uses integrated graphics I saw this clip on youtube and some guy had the encoding going x4 using the i7 IG (integrated graphics). But all I have is a x6 AMD core. Any all in all looking for the fastest ripper on the market free or not.

[redwudz]

I'm assuming you are commenting about encoding/conversion? Ripping is just exact copying the disc to your HDD. I have a six core AMD OC'd to 3.6Ghz with integrated graphics. It takes about 20 minutes average to encode/convert a DVD disc to a MKV with great quality at about 2GB size. This is with VidCoder/Handbrake. That's fast enough for me.

Using CUDA, you may get a faster encode to some formats, but the quality may suffer a bit.

You didn't mention what format you are converting to or what program you use for this and what quality you want?

[AndreL]

Thank you for that clarification, ripping straight to a DVD-5 and quality is not that impotant just enough to fill the whole disc not to waste any space on the blank disc.

Using CUDA, you may get a faster encode to some formats, but the quality may suffer a bit.

Did not know that, I'm most concern is speed, but not where the quality the movie terrible.

So the main featers is speed speed speed thank a lot for your replay

Also if I get a faster graphics card with more cuda cores will that speed up my encoding ...

[KTH]

More CUDA cores would definitely encode faster. Encoding a 44 minute HD video using CUDA on my 8600GTS with 32 CUDA cores took 1:34:22, but my GeForce GTX 550 Ti (Fermi) with 192 CUDA cores did it in 22:44. This was even faster than my Intel i7 3770k using Quick Sync which took 25:15. Using x264 (2-pass) software encoding took 2:11:05 on the same video. I also found out since then that x264 encoding even using 1-pass encoding can provide superior video quality than both CUDA or Quick Sync at far lower bitrates. This would produce smaller files sizes, but would take a lot more time to encode.