VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. Member KyleMadrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Search PM
    Hi all, I'm new to all this stuff, but I'm very keen to learn. I do have a small amount of knowledge with videos in general, but it's very limited.

    I have a whole lot of questions, but the first thing I would like to know is... why don't movies, whether they be on Bluray or DVD, take up the full screen? I have a full HD 1920x1080 monitor, but when I watch a Bluray movie on it, the movie is not shown in that resolution, and therefore has black parts at the top and bottom. I don't have a problem with this, I don't mind it at all, but I am just simply curious as to why movies are displayed like this? Also, I have a DVB-T tuner from which I watch football (soccer) matches live on my computer in HD, and they take up the full screen, and don't have any black parts like the movies do...

    Can someone please explain to me why this is the case? Once again, I don't have a problem with this, I'm just curious.

    Thanks in advance to anyone willing to help, any help will be greatly appreciated
    Quote Quote  
  2. I'm a MEGA Super Moderator Baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    It's because many movies are shot in 2.35:1 aspect ratio and that is wider than 16:9 monitors/tvs.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image) and http://www.widescreen.org/aspect_ratios.shtml
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member KyleMadrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Search PM
    Thanks, Baldrick. I will take a look.
    Quote Quote  
  4. The simple answer is that video uses all sorts of different dimensions (aspect ratios) but DVD and Bluray video only support two. 16:9 and 4:3. If the picture doesn't use one of those, any remaining area becomes black bars.

    Often when widescreen movies are broadcast for TV, instead of using black bars, the picture is effectively enlarged to fill a 16:9 screen, or in the past, to fill a 4:3 screen. The process for doing so means some of the picture from the sides is lost. When "intelligently" removing much of the picture to make a wider aspect ratio video fill a 4:3 screen, the process is known as "pan and scan". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_and_scan
    I guess if some of the picture from a wider aspect ratio ratio video is removed so it can fill a 16:9 screen, the pan and scan method is probably still used at times.

    There's also other methods used to get the picture fill an entire screen, depending on the format in which it was shot. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_matte
    Quote Quote  
  5. This:
    Originally Posted by Baldrick View Post
    It's because many movies are shot in 2.35:1 aspect ratio and that is wider than 16:9 monitors/tvs.
    Before the advent of HDTV nothing was shot at 16:9. The closest common film aspect ratio was 1.85:1. Most "widescreen" movies are ~2.35:1.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jagabo
    Most "widescreen" movies are ~2.35:1.
    Yep but there are a few that are 2.4:1 and I think I've seen 2.5:1 which is quite unusual. The disaster movie 2012 is 2.4:1 for example - i just pulled my disc out to confirm. I can't remember off hand if 2.5:1 is real or not but I think I saw one that was "higher" than 2.4 I just can't recall off the top of my head right now.
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  7. 2001 A Space Odyssey was 2.20:1. Kubrick shot a lot of his other films at 1.66:1.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Indian Ocean
    Search Comp PM
    2.40:1 AR is commonly used, I think. Many of my bluray backups are done @ 1920x800.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!