VideoHelp Forum
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread
  1. Hi guys.

    I have a bunch of videos in FLV format that I have used FLVExtract then Yamb to change the container to MP4.
    Resulting videos are perfect in quality, like the original content, but the file size is far too large.
    I've tried re-encoding videos over the years using handbrake, etc, and am never really impressed with my end result. Either the audio goes out of sync, or the file size decrease doesn't warrant the loss in quality.

    I have about 50 files that will ultimately need to get re-encoded, so something with a batch ability would be great.
    What I'm wondering is, how do I get the small file sizes, but keep the quality near what it currently is? I've seen a lot of encodes online, and for the file size, are simply amazing. How is this done?

    Here is the info for the MP4 file:
    General
    Complete name : File
    Format : MPEG-4
    Format profile : Base Media
    Codec ID : isom
    File size : 1.98 GiB
    Duration : 1h 52mn
    Overall bit rate mode : Variable
    Overall bit rate : 2 505 Kbps
    Encoded date : UTC 2012-10-05 15:25:55
    Tagged date : UTC 2012-10-05 15:25:55
    Writing application : Yamb 2.1.0.0 [http://yamb.unite-video.com]

    Video
    ID : 1
    Format : AVC
    Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
    Format profile : Baseline@L3.1
    Format settings, CABAC : No
    Format settings, ReFrames : 2 frames
    Codec ID : avc1
    Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
    Duration : 1h 52mn
    Bit rate : 2 246 Kbps
    Maximum bit rate : 8 082 Kbps
    Width : 1 280 pixels
    Height : 720 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 16:9
    Frame rate mode : Constant
    Frame rate : 24.000 fps
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Progressive
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.102
    Stream size : 1.77 GiB (90%)
    Encoded date : UTC 2012-10-05 15:25:55
    Tagged date : UTC 2012-10-05 15:29:32
    Color primaries : BT.709
    Transfer characteristics : BT.709
    Matrix coefficients : BT.709

    Audio
    ID : 2
    Format : AAC
    Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
    Format profile : LC
    Codec ID : 40
    Duration : 1h 52mn
    Bit rate mode : Variable
    Bit rate : 256 Kbps
    Maximum bit rate : 267 Kbps
    Channel(s) : 2 channels
    Channel positions : Front: L R
    Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
    Compression mode : Lossy
    Stream size : 207 MiB (10%)
    Encoded date : UTC 2012-10-05 15:29:05
    Tagged date : UTC 2012-10-05 15:29:32
    Thanks guys!
    Last edited by Casey_Jones; 6th Oct 2012 at 19:45.
    Quote Quote  
  2. That bitrate is already pretty low. Unless you're willing to reduce the frame size you're not going to get it lower without loss of quality. And of course, the frame size is a part of the quality, so you're still won't really be retaining quality. You're just trading off resolution to get a lower bitrate.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Oh wow. Ok.

    So I guess my question is, how are people online putting up 1080p blu ray rips at 700mb, and you really can't tell they aren't blu ray?

    Magic? haha
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by Casey_Jones View Post
    So I guess my question is, how are people online putting up 1080p blu ray rips at 700mb
    They're not.

    One thing to keep in mind though: some videos compress better than others. Cartoons and anime are usually much more compressible than live action film.
    Last edited by jagabo; 6th Oct 2012 at 23:09.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member AlanHK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Search Comp PM
    You could save 100 MB or so by reducing the audio rate. 256 kbps AAC is very high quality.
    128 or even 64 is fine for most purposes, unless it's a concert video.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Other things to consider:

    Compressing a 20 GB Blu-ray rip directly to 700MB file will give you better quality than compressing it first to a 2 GB file then compressing that 2 GB file to a 700MB file.

    x264 is good enough that if you didn't see the original Blu-ray video you might think a 700MB x264 video looks pretty good. But if you had the original to compare to you would see that all the small low contrast detail (like film grain, fuzzy shirts, stucco walls, etc.) is gone, sharp edges have gotten rougher, there is more posterization, and there are more blocky artifacts.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!