Hi,
Not sure if this is the right forum to ask such questions, but I recently read a short notice on scanning super-8 film reels, frame by frame, using an ordinary flatbed scanner.
Does anyone have any own experiences with this method? I have a Canon 9000F flatbed scanner and some old film reels which I'd love to digitise. Does it require any additional equipment, such as dedicated film holder etc?
Thanks in advance.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
-
When I was about to do some film scanning I considered this. But....
Standard flatbed scanner do not produce enough light, if I remember correctly. You also need some form of transport system to advance the frames across the bed. Then....
You need software to put all the frames, and we are talking 000's of frames here just for one reel of film, in the correct order.
If you want to see if your scanner is put to the task, get hold of a film slide and just do one scan. If the scan is too dark then you can forget it. And it is not the best way to test since 8mm frames are much smaller than 35 mm slides -
Thanks for your posting.
I see. But if I decide to try, is there any risk I could damage the film reel through handling it, ie do I need take any actions to prevent the reel from being scratched or damaged during the experiment?
I've got a slide holder and a 35mm negative holder that both came along with the scanner.
/Anders -
-
-
I looks like a cumbersome task.
I tried a local film-to-dvd for a sample conversion a few years ago but wasn't entirely happy with the result - compared with the original the colours looked weird and the film was very dark. etc. Not sure if my luck is better with any other film conversion professional.
I have cotton cloves which I picked up at a local chemist's, which might be useful if I decide to give it a go.
I made a quick google search for 8mm holders and got 64000 hits. However, most sellers seems to be over seas and not very cheap. There might be other's though as I just took a sample look. -
TBH you would have to be a maschochist to even attempt this process. Can you imagine the initial process of scanning some 8000 images for one reel ?
Finding a good transfer company in Europe can be a pain and they do not come cheap. I finally settled for a mirrox-box system and a video camera with the camera just acting as a means of a video capture intermediary. Still needed post-production work after that. -
You need a flatbed scanner with a film (backlight) adapter.
A homebrew adapter:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/07/14/how-to-scan-film-using-your-ordinary-flatbed-scanner/ -
-
I mirror box I used was a Riaser. This is a German system. Probably more expensive than a Hama.
Projector light and shutter flicker are the main issues with these systems.
They give reasonable results and you can get better if you are prepared to put the time in to the post-production. -
You need a flatbed scanner with a film (backlight) adapter.
A homebrew adapter:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/07/14/...atbed-scanner/
If I understand correctly you don't have to scan picture by picture but put the movie to the length of the scan are ( that is 30 frames give or take at once and after that you can cut individually all frames into pictures and assemble them in vdub as video file ) -
Have fun. One small reel of Super 8 will give you over 3,000 frames to assemble.
Similar Threads
-
photo scanning vs negative scanning
By lordhutt in forum ComputerReplies: 66Last Post: 7th Nov 2010, 18:09 -
Play an MTS file frame by frame, displaying timecode or frame number
By SeánB in forum Software PlayingReplies: 5Last Post: 5th Oct 2010, 16:26 -
What is AVI(for pocket PC) in Super?and keep aspect ratio in Super ?
By SingSing in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 19th Dec 2009, 21:05 -
Old scanner...
By alegator in forum ComputerReplies: 18Last Post: 26th May 2009, 17:17 -
scanner help
By Mr anderson in forum ComputerReplies: 7Last Post: 18th Jan 2008, 12:08