You are not exactly helping yourself here. The request was for the original vob BEFORE patching and not AFTER.
Surely, if you have the dvd you can do that since the vob you have uploaded is patched. The result is identical to what I achieved except I can not check the AR as originally report by mediainfo.
What concerns me also if why your vob is NTSC. There is no logical reason to release it like that for the Australian market especially given that the dvd I have is all region PAL. I have some music dvds released in the UK as NTSC and that makes more sense but this one is PAL.
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
Closed Thread
Results 31 to 49 of 49
Thread
-
-
Guest34343Guest
I'm downloading the stream now and will find out why it is causing some apps, including DGIndex, to barf. Apparently you have resolved the aspect ratio question.
-
Guest34343Guest
OK, mystery solved.
One of the sequence headers near the middle of the file has the load_non_intra_quantiser_matrix flag set, but the expected 64 bytes of quantiser matrix that should follow are missing. This causes the parser to consume the following start code elements as matrix data:
sequence extension
sequence_display_extension
gop_header
picture_header (first I field of an IP field pair, this is field structure)
picture_coding_extension
first slice
Needless to say, this confounds DGIndex's parser, and some other tools as well.
I was able to implement a workaround but I'm not sure it's worth it, given that the stream is obviously broken, and that the OP's processing of the original VOB may have caused this. The spec says that none of the matrix element values can be 0. So I look and if I see any 0's I pretend the load_non_intra_quantiser_matrix flag was not set. Obviously I will see 0's because there are start codes there where the matrix values should be.
If this was not caused by DVDPatcher I would consider releasing it. Maybe DB83 can post the corresponding section from the original DVD. I also wonder why the patched VOB is NTSC when the original is PAL.Last edited by Guest34343; 14th Aug 2012 at 15:01.
-
Thanks for the explanation neuron
Assuming it wasn't DVDPatcher, how would this happen in the wild (why would only 1 sequence header somewhere in the middle be affected)
-
Thanks very much for taking a look at it. Apparently the DVD has quite a bit wrong with it, judging from the reviews I see here and there.
Skywalka (the OP) has the NTSC version. One might wonder why he bought it because, if the VOB for this song is any indication, the whole thing is a lousy PAL to NTSC conversion, and the PAL versions will be of much better (relative) quality.
-
-
Guest34343Guest
It was only one in the sample. There could have been more in the whole VOB.
It's hard to say how it could have happened. Could be a buggy encoder. Could be a simple bit error in copying or
transmission. But my money's on DVDPatcher hosing it up.
-
Guest34343Guest
Here you can see the problem in my MPEG2 analyzer. The highlighted sequence header is expanded on the right. If you convert the matrix data to hex, you see that it is actually video data.
After posting this I see that the VBV buffer size is also suspiciously large.
http://neuron2.net/misc/analysis.jpg
-
As promised, here is the link for my rip of the un-patched vob from the PAL dvd.
http://depositfiles.com/files/nttisp6sj
For a giggle, I also tried to patch the vob as NTSC. The result was even worse than that as already posted so it seems that the OP's disk was NTSC. I also had tons of warnings about changing format.
When you play this I think you will agree that the AR is not even 16:9 (mediainfo reports 2.40:1). The impression I get is that a 16:9 letterbox to 4:3 source was used and then stretched again to 16:9. Patch this back to 4:3 will still give you some borders which, for me, proves that the original source was not pure 4:3.
-
It has the same basic problem as the OP's video. It's a widescreen (somewhere between 4:3 and 16:9) video letterboxed in a 4:3 DVD frame but flagged as 16:9 and includes a sequence display extension that says the 16:9 picture is in the inner 540x576 sub frame. So the full frame plays back as ~2.4:1. It should have been flagged as 4:3.
The video is much cleaner than the OP's though.Last edited by jagabo; 15th Aug 2012 at 07:29.
-
Guest34343Guest
As the site is telling me this download will require 3 hours, I ask: Does this PAL sample crash DGIndex?
-
Sorry about that. I chose this host as it appeared a little faster than some I have experienced lately (including Rapidshare).
For the record, I have just demuxed the vob through DGindex and I received no errors.
I also did the same for my patched version of the same file. Also received no errors altough the demux appeared to take longer ( I did not time them)
-
Guest34343Guest
Thanks. I wonder where skywalka went. It would be nice to get closure on this.
-
Hi guys. I was unaware that replies had been made to this thread. I am surprised to see it has taken on a life of it's own.
I do not have the DVD. I downloaded the DVD but thought discretion was best. Maybe not?
I don't know if this is of any use to you but here you go:
It is no longer available from where I got it:
no warez linksLast edited by Baldrick; 13th Sep 2012 at 11:06.
-
Guest34343Guest
LOL. Your honesty is refreshing.
I already added the patch for the next DGDecNV release so I won't download the torrent to see if it was in the original or caused by DVD Patcher. I don't even have a torrent client installed anyway.
Similar Threads
-
Changing Aspect Ratio for .avi
By Sizdar in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 5Last Post: 3rd Aug 2012, 19:09 -
Changing aspect ratio for WMV?
By vato76 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 4th Feb 2010, 09:27 -
Changing a DVD's Aspect Ratio
By soneman in forum Authoring (DVD)Replies: 11Last Post: 8th Sep 2009, 18:18 -
Changing aspect ratio.
By Lyceum in forum EditingReplies: 5Last Post: 28th May 2009, 12:19 -
Changing aspect ratio?
By Marlow in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 5th Apr 2009, 05:40