BDRB "USE X264's internal LAVF for decoding"

[wulf109]

delete

[fritzi93]

You removed your post.

Anyway, I did a comparison once, and it was round about 10% speed improvement, IIRC.

I was under the impression that LAVF is faster because frame serving is sped up, and it allows the use of the 64-bit x.264 encoder. If you're running a 64-bit OS, of course.

[jman98]

You removed your post.

Yeah. Gotta love that. At least it is better than one of our former members who used it to delete his posts in something like over 500 posts and he replaced every one of them with a link to ginormous thread on another site. He rendered almost completely useless here one of our largest threads (and a very helpful one too), which in this case was about Philips/Magnavox DVD recorders.

Anyway, we're stuck now. Someone will find this via an internet search. In my opinion most users should use this option with BDRB. If you have interlaced VC-1 video you are trying to encode with it, it may be your only hope of getting it working. BDRB still can't handle interlaced VC-1 video all of the time as it works on some and completely fails on others, but it will definitely fail 100% of the time if you don't use this option.

[wulf109]

I found that it does speed up encoding,but it seems erratic and cpu dependant. It speeds up the demux and rebuild cycles about 10%,doesn't seem to effect the actual video encode. Seemed to speed up my x4-620 but not my 1090T. Haven't checked my I-7.