here's a question for you guys, what's your opinion of in-loop deblocking filters, specifically x264's implementation? back when i used to use main concept's h264 encoder i used to disable it as it seemed to me that it would smooth out some details in an attempt to make the perceived quality seem higher (what it really did was give that "plastic doll" look to the encodes).
lately i have been playing around with 3 pass x264@uf encodes and while digging around some of the settings noticed that it too has an in-loop deblocking filter enabled by default. obviously the best answer is to do a bunch of test encodes and decide for myself, but i'm just wondering what some of you guys that use x264 all the time thing about this issue.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
-
Overall it's a good thing
Some people reduce the alpha/beta values when using higher bitrates (but actually internally, value is automatically adjusted at higher bitrates/lower quants), or even disable it when using enormous bitrates
It's automatically disabled when you use --tune fastdecode, because deblocking (along with CABAC) are probably the most CPU intensive attributes for decoding h264
Similar Threads
-
How to keep ffdshow post processing(deblocking filter) in finalized video
By Milardo in forum EditingReplies: 6Last Post: 5th Apr 2011, 05:09 -
Help finding an AviSynth deblocking filter that works at high resolutions
By Cman21 in forum EditingReplies: 17Last Post: 9th Nov 2010, 06:30 -
What would be a good container for H264 video?
By thymej in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 0Last Post: 3rd Nov 2008, 20:19 -
Is there such a thing as a good DVD recorder?
By ibex333 in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 95Last Post: 25th Oct 2008, 19:00 -
Using MSU Smart Deblocking Filter...
By AshleyQuick in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 28th Apr 2008, 20:17