VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. Hi everyone,

    I'm quite new here and I hope everyone here don't mind me asking a few questions

    I have these 2 videos. One is an MP4 and the other is an RMVB. I used MediaInfo to have a look at their stats, but I can't tell which one is better.
    I did notice the resolution difference and the small video bit-rate difference but I still needed some help to know which on is better.

    Second Question down below

    Here are the 2 codes/stats for the Videos.

    Here is the MP4:
    Code:
    Format                           : MPEG-4
    Format profile                   : Base Media
    Codec ID                         : isom
    File size                        : 54.3 MiB
    Duration                         : 24mn 29s
    Overall bit rate                 : 310 Kbps
    Encoded date                     : UTC 2009-07-12 08:53:59
    Tagged date                      : UTC 2009-07-12 08:53:59
    
    Video
    ID                               : 1
    Format                           : AVC
    Format/Info                      : Advanced Video Codec
    Format profile                   : High@L5.1
    Format settings, CABAC           : Yes
    Format settings, ReFrames        : 8 frames
    Codec ID                         : avc1
    Codec ID/Info                    : Advanced Video Coding
    Duration                         : 24mn 29s
    Bit rate mode                    : Variable
    Bit rate                         : 275 Kbps
    Maximum bit rate                 : 2 113 Kbps
    Width                            : 512 pixels
    Height                           : 288 pixels
    Display aspect ratio             : 16:9
    Original display aspect ratio    : 16:9
    Frame rate mode                  : Constant
    Frame rate                       : 23.976 fps
    Color space                      : YUV
    Chroma subsampling               : 4:2:0
    Bit depth                        : 8 bits
    Scan type                        : Progressive
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame)               : 0.078
    Stream size                      : 48.2 MiB (89%)
    Writing library                  : x264 core 56 svn-680
    Encoding settings                : cabac=1 / ref=5 / deblock=1:1:1 / analyse=0x3:0x133 / me=umh / subme=6 / brdo=1 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / chroma_qp_offset=0 / threads=3 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / mbaff=0 / bframes=5 / b_pyramid=1 / b_adapt=1 / b_bias=0 / direct=1 / wpredb=1 / bime=1 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40(pre) / rc=2pass / bitrate=275 / ratetol=1.0 / rceq='blurCplx^(1-qComp)' / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=10 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / cplxblur=20.0 / qblur=0.5 / ip_ratio=1.40 / pb_ratio=1.30
    Encoded date                     : UTC 2009-07-12 08:53:59
    Tagged date                      : UTC 2009-07-12 08:54:07
    
    Audio
    ID                               : 2
    Format                           : AAC
    Format/Info                      : Advanced Audio Codec
    Format version                   : Version 4
    Format profile                   : LC
    Format settings, SBR             : Yes
    Format settings, PS              : Yes
    Codec ID                         : 40
    Duration                         : 24mn 29s
    Bit rate mode                    : Variable
    Bit rate                         : 32.0 Kbps
    Maximum bit rate                 : 35.0 Kbps
    Channel(s)                       : 2 channels
    Channel positions                : Front: L R
    Sampling rate                    : 48.0 KHz
    Stream size                      : 5.61 MiB (10%)
    Encoded date                     : UTC 2009-07-12 08:54:07
    Tagged date                      : UTC 2009-07-12 08:54:07
    And here is the RMVB:

    Code:
    Format                           : RealMedia
    File size                        : 71.2 MiB
    Duration                         : 24mn 9s
    Overall bit rate                 : 399 Kbps
    Movie name                       : Bakemonogatari - 01
    Performer                        : RealityLapse.com
    
    Video
    ID                               : 0
    Format                           : RealVideo 4
    Codec ID                         : RV40
    Codec ID/Info                    : Based on AVC (H.264), Real Player 9
    Duration                         : 24mn 9s
    Bit rate                         : 303 Kbps
    Width                            : 1 280 pixels
    Height                           : 720 pixels
    Display aspect ratio             : 16:9
    Frame rate                       : 23.000 fps
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame)               : 0.014
    Stream size                      : 52.4 MiB (74%)
    
    Audio
    ID                               : 1
    Format                           : Cooker
    Codec ID                         : cook
    Codec ID/Info                    : Based on G.722.1, Real Player 6
    Duration                         : 24mn 10s
    Bit rate                         : 96.5 Kbps
    Channel(s)                       : 2 channels
    Sampling rate                    : 44.1 KHz
    Bit depth                        : 16 bits
    Stream size                      : 16.7 MiB (23%)
    I was wondering which one is better, because I want to watch these on the PS3. I don't mind converting RMVB to MP4 again to watch it on the PS3.
    But I was wondering as well. If I convert RMVB to a MP4 format for the PS3. Would it have better video quality then the other MP4? Because of the original resolution? Or would the Other MP4 have a better resolution (if) I convert it.

    Thank you in advance~
    Mooshi~~
    Quote Quote  
  2. You cannot tell from looking at stats alone. They don't convey how it was encoded (e.g. one may have had prefilters). The only way to tell is to examine them
    Quote Quote  
  3. Well if that's true, then I guess the RMVB is bad.
    It's kind of pixelated.



    And the MP4 isn't so bad.



    But what if I convert the RMVB. Would it have a better quality then the MP4?
    Quote Quote  
  4. VH Wanderer Ai Haibara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Somewhere on VideoHelp...
    Search Comp PM
    No. You can't regain quality. You can attempt to make it look better with filters and such, but more or less, it's not going to get any better than it already is. Worse, re-encoding generally takes a quality hit.
    If cameras add ten pounds, why would people want to eat them?
    Quote Quote  
  5. So, in conclusion out of these 2 Mp4 is better then RMVB?

    What about overall?
    Which is better? MP4 or RMVB? o.o?
    Quote Quote  
  6. VH Wanderer Ai Haibara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Somewhere on VideoHelp...
    Search Comp PM
    I'd say you'd be the best judge of that, if you mean whether or not your MP4s are better than your RMVBs. The image from the MP4 does look a lot better than the RMVB, but that still may not be enough to determine which of the two encodes you'd prefer.

    Overall? Both containers allow for high-quality video, I believe. It all depends on how it was encoded (and the source which it was encoded from).

    I should note, though, that RealMedia formats are proprietary, and it may be a hassle to find converters to work with them as well as you'd prefer, all of the time. And, as you know, the PS3 doesn't play RMVBs. But just having a file in an MP4 container isn't a guarantee the PS3 will like it, either.
    If cameras add ten pounds, why would people want to eat them?
    Quote Quote  
  7. It all depends on how it was encoded (and the source which it was encoded from).
    What do you mean by, "On how it was encoded (and the source which it was encoded from)" ?

    Also yes that is true, not all MP4 files are accepted by the PS3. Especially the audio...=.=" (Been having trouble with it lately ;D)

    I guess it is to which I choose.
    But can I hear your opinions? I'm still new with the video community, so I don't know as much.

    ::EDIT::
    I converted the RMVB to MP4 so that it can be played...but it was...
    HORRIBLE!

    I guess my choice is MP4!

    Thank you all for your help
    Last edited by mooshimuushi; 7th Aug 2010 at 00:49. Reason: Adding some info~
    Quote Quote  
  8. VH Wanderer Ai Haibara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Somewhere on VideoHelp...
    Search Comp PM
    Well, I usually prefer working with MKV and AVI containers - but remember, it all depends upon the quality of the video/audio used to create the initial encode, so that even the highly-compressed RMVB can be decent, if you create it from excellent-quality video and audio sources. (That's what I meant - for example, a video's going to look a LOT better if you encode using high-definition sources, rather than a low-quality FLV from YouTube, a 160x120 capture from an old TV card, etc.)

    Also, you want to avoid converting as much as possible, because as you noticed, you'll usually get a decrease in quality. It can be even worse for RMVB, as the converters may not support it fully or properly.
    If cameras add ten pounds, why would people want to eat them?
    Quote Quote  
  9. Ahh I get it now...(I think).

    So a good video and audio source is from a DVD right?
    That's where the original work is.

    Hmm, I see. I seeeee.

    Thank you a lot Ai Haibara for your help!
    I've learnt many things from just this tiny thread
    Thank you.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!