VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I have used Ripbot264 to backup several blueray disks to a media server. Only problem after demuxing I don't have the option to xx copy the audio stream when using the mkv container. I can do 640 Kbps AC3 or lower. I'd rather use the original audio stream if I'm going to all this trouble. If i'm doing a DTS stream, after demuxing it always says pcm at the top right above the audio drop down and never has the DTS icon that I've noticed in all the screenshot for the tutorials. Anyone know whats going on.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Select FLAC . Problem solved.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Not really, if I select FLAC on a DTS stream I can do x.x copy stream, but it still says PCM above the audio drop down and the final mkv is a 6 channel flac audio stream.

    why does it not demux into a .dts?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Search Comp PM
    The best way I've kept the DTS is I use tsMuxer to demux the TrueHD or DTS track from the ripped disk, and after RipBot does its thing I take the mkv RipBot made and mux it with the TrueHD/DTS using mkvmerge GUI. I hope this helps. If you need me to do a screen capture of all the steps I take its not a problem.
    Quote Quote  
  5. "why does it not demux into a .dts?"
    Because it does not make SENSE!

    If you need lossless audio then FLAC is better because has higher compression!
    Also FLAC -> AC3 640 kbps = DTS core 1,5mbps in terms of quality!

    I see no reason to waste space for stupid DTS if AC3 is more efficient. Period.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Search PM
    ["why does it not demux into a .dts?"
    Because it does not make SENSE!
    ...
    ...AC3 640 kbps = DTS core 1,5mbps in terms of quality!
    I see no reason to waste space for stupid DTS if AC3 is more efficient...]



    I' m curious, now !
    Why all theese ac-3hd,dtshd,...,dtshd2,supershit2 exist, then ?
    For the surviving of the factories?
    Does it make sense to buy new tech, or not ?
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Atak. Thats not the question now is it. I don't need a lossless audio format. I would like to keep the original audio and if I do a media info on the file I would like it to say what the orginal audion is.

    Bwizzy, thx, I'll give it a shot.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!