I have a celeron desktop with 512 mb of ram, an ATI dual head video card (128 mb ram) 15K 36 GB HD, a 10K 72 GB and a 1TB hard drive on the way, that I can upgrade to a 3.06 ghz P4 with 3gb of memory for about $40. I was planning on just getting parts for a whole new computer...then this really neat sale came up on a camcorder, and, well, you know how that goes.
With the P4 will I be able to do real time editing? - that is one reason why I got the dual head video card. With the present system it takes about 3 hours to render 1 hour of video (am using Ulead v. 9) With the upgraded system will I come close to having a 1 to 1 ratio for rendering? i.e. one hour to render one hour of video? Does rendering time depend on the software being used?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
Originally Posted by Haopengyou
Originally Posted by Haopengyou
Originally Posted by Haopengyou
Originally Posted by Haopengyou -
A Core2Duo processor will get you faster than 1:1 for MPeg2 encoding with ULead's Mainconcept encoder.
Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
http://www.kiva.org/about
Similar Threads
-
cpu vs gpu for video rendering with i5 460m 2.53 ghz
By Edgarke16 in forum Software PlayingReplies: 6Last Post: 3rd Jan 2012, 05:43 -
Cores Vs. Ghz for photo programs ?
By Noahtuck in forum ComputerReplies: 31Last Post: 9th Sep 2010, 22:06 -
computer power ghz ?
By luc13137 in forum EditingReplies: 6Last Post: 2nd Aug 2010, 22:08 -
clarkdale hitting 4 ghz on air
By deadrats in forum ComputerReplies: 2Last Post: 25th Jul 2009, 07:09 -
iMac G5 as fast as new SR 2.4 Ghz MB Pro? This can't be right.
By Scallywag in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 4Last Post: 21st Jun 2007, 22:59