VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 44 of 44
  1. Originally Posted by tarrickb
    Ok, I'll accept the fact that I can't correctly output 29.97fps video from Vegas with this type of source file. However, what is the disadvantage of outputting 59.94fps wmv video considering that there is no ghosting?
    none, other than it isn't in a very useful format.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Originally Posted by minidv2dvd
    Originally Posted by tarrickb
    Ok, I'll accept the fact that I can't correctly output 29.97fps video from Vegas with this type of source file. However, what is the disadvantage of outputting 59.94fps wmv video considering that there is no ghosting?
    none, other than it isn't in a very useful format.
    and you're ~doubling the size given the same quality because of the dupes. useless dead space...
    Quote Quote  
  3. WMV should be smart enough to recognize the duplicate frames and just say "display the last frame again". So the files size (given constant quality encoding) or quality (given bitrate based encoding) will hardly be any different. Some computers will have difficulty playing 60 fps video though.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by jagabo
    WMV should be smart enough to recognize the duplicate frames and just say "display the last frame again". So the files size (given constant quality encoding) or quality (given bitrate based encoding) will hardly be any different. Some computers will have difficulty playing 60 fps video though.
    You're right , "double" was a hyperbole, but wmv isn't that efficient. For kicks, I did a quick test and it was 1.75x the size using VBR quality 90. I used avisynth, and interleave() to simulate the the double fps duped clip

    EDIT: I suspect it was because of a short clip test, the efficiency would be better on a longer clip, and it is. ~1.25x the size on a longer sample
    Quote Quote  
  5. Poisondeathray, I ran a few quick WMV tests and found about the same as you.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Again, I must start off this response with a great big THANK YOU. The contributions to this post have been tremendous and are greatly appreciated. I fully understand what has been explained by all of you.

    Now my last question (as I'm willing to give up on WMV) is, what are your opinions on an efficient format to store these AVCHD-lite files? I definitely don't want to keep them in this wacky format but want to keep high quality video and am not concerned with the size (as long as the encoded videos are no larger than the originals).
    Should I stick with XviD or are there any other (better) recommendations?

    Thanks!
    Quote Quote  
  7. Xvid at the same bitrate (same file size) won't look as good. For archiving I would leave the MTS files as they are. Hopefully future software updates will fix the problems in Vegas (and other programs).

    You might try poisondeathray's suggestion of using h264info to change the frame rate flags. The program crashed when I tried it though. (I demuxed the MTS with TsMuxerGui, opened the .264 elementary stream in h264info, tried to save, crash, empty output file).

    Doesn't Vegas have an option to use simple decimation/duplication for changing frame rates?
    Quote Quote  
  8. Doesn't Vegas have an option to use simple decimation/duplication for changing frame rates?
    normally this wouldn't be any problem at all for vegas. all it would require is right clicking on the file/properties and changing the fps from 59.94 to the proper 29.97. unfortunately vegas can't/won't with these, as the option is grayed out.
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    From what I see with XviD, encoding via Avisynth and VirtualDub with the following settings, I find it difficult to see any differences compared to the original.

    Video
    ID : 0
    Format : MPEG-4 Visual
    Format profile : AdvancedSimple@L5
    Format settings, BVOP : Yes
    Format settings, QPel : No
    Format settings, GMC : No warppoints
    Format settings, Matrix : Default (H.263)
    Muxing mode : Packed bitstream
    Codec ID : XVID
    Codec ID/Hint : XviD
    Duration : 39s 472ms
    Bit rate : 3 830 Kbps
    Width : 1 280 pixels
    Height : 720 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 16/9
    Frame rate : 29.970 fps
    Resolution : 24 bits
    Colorimetry : 4:2:0
    Scan type : Progressive
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.139
    Stream size : 18.0 MiB (95%)
    Quote Quote  
  10. Look at enlarged still frames. You will see a lot of macroblocking in the Xvid file at that low a bitrate.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member racer-x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    3rd Rock from the Sun
    Search Comp PM
    I just wanted to post a simple fix for the editing in Vegas your panasonic clips:

    Use the 1280 x 720p @ 29.97fps template.
    Drag your clip into the Timeline
    Right-Click on the clip and select Switches > Disable Resample. (do this for each clip you import)

    You can now edit and end up with clean Ghost-free footage.

    Got my retirement plans all set. Looks like I only have to work another 5 years after I die........
    Quote Quote  
  12. nice! hidden in "switches", i never noticed it was there.
    Quote Quote  
  13. nice work raxer-x! I never knew about that function either

    Cheers
    Quote Quote  
  14. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Awesome, great find racer-x. I guess we can consider this post case closed.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!