MediaCoder (cuda) did a pretty poor job compared to RipBot (x264). Mediacoder lost most of the film grain leading to obvious posterization artifacts and creepy crawlies in smooth gradients. It also shows bad "beating" (a clean I frame followed by degrading image quality through the following B/P frames, then a sudden cleanup at the next I frame, etc.). The settings used were different though and x264 overshot the requested bitrate by about 15 percent.
By the way, when I tested Mediacoder a few months ago on my Intel Q6600 and Nvidia 8600 GT I found the computer was pretty much unusable while encoding. Mediacoder was sucking up so much of the GPU that there wasn't much left for other apps. Do you see the same thing?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 32 of 32
-
Last edited by jagabo; 22nd Feb 2010 at 07:24.
-
Jagabo, thanks for your comments.
I'm waiting for some more opinions before
I consider how to move on with shrinking my blu-rays to an acceptable quality in reasonable time.
And no, I have no problems doing other work on my computer at the same time.
It maybe depends on which version of MediaCoder being used.Last edited by ulapines; 23rd Feb 2010 at 00:07.
Similar Threads
-
Best results with Open Source Codecs?
By aahamm in forum Video ConversionReplies: 9Last Post: 3rd Feb 2012, 17:56 -
CUDA - Accelerated encoding for post production
By Wile_E in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 6th Jan 2011, 06:58 -
Do you donate to open source software?
By yoda313 in forum PollsReplies: 15Last Post: 28th Aug 2009, 19:15 -
What's the best Open Source equivalent to Nero?
By OM2 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 7Last Post: 1st Feb 2009, 14:39 -
A proposal for Open Source HD-DVD
By hddvdrebel in forum DVD & Blu-ray PlayersReplies: 8Last Post: 27th Mar 2008, 21:12