VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. MediaCoder (cuda) did a pretty poor job compared to RipBot (x264). Mediacoder lost most of the film grain leading to obvious posterization artifacts and creepy crawlies in smooth gradients. It also shows bad "beating" (a clean I frame followed by degrading image quality through the following B/P frames, then a sudden cleanup at the next I frame, etc.). The settings used were different though and x264 overshot the requested bitrate by about 15 percent.

    By the way, when I tested Mediacoder a few months ago on my Intel Q6600 and Nvidia 8600 GT I found the computer was pretty much unusable while encoding. Mediacoder was sucking up so much of the GPU that there wasn't much left for other apps. Do you see the same thing?
    Last edited by jagabo; 22nd Feb 2010 at 07:24.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Search Comp PM
    Jagabo, thanks for your comments.
    I'm waiting for some more opinions before
    I consider how to move on with shrinking my blu-rays to an acceptable quality in reasonable time.
    And no, I have no problems doing other work on my computer at the same time.
    It maybe depends on which version of MediaCoder being used.
    Last edited by ulapines; 23rd Feb 2010 at 00:07.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!