Richard Marx attacks RIAA after $1.92M Thomas verdict

[deadrats]

by now i'm sure most of you have seen the debate that transpired here:

https://forum.videohelp.com/topic369575.html

here is what one of the artists who's music was among the "illegally" downloaded has to say about the trial and judgement:

As a longtime professional songwriter, I have always objected to the practice of illegal downloading of music. I have also always, however, been sympathetic to the average music fan, who has been consistently financially abused by the greedy actions of major labels. These labels, until recently, were responsible for the distribution of the majority of recorded music, and instead of nurturing the industry and doing their best to provide the highest quality of music to the fans, they predominantly chose to ream the consumer and fill their pockets.

So now we have a "judgment" in a case of illegal downloading, and it seems to me, especially in these extremely volatile economic times, that holding Ms. Thomas-Rasset accountable for the continuing daily actions of hundreds of thousands of people is, at best, misguided and at worst, farcical. Her accountability itself is not in question, but this show of force posing as judicial come-uppance is clearly abusive. Ms. Thomas-Rasset, I think you got a raw deal, and I'm ashamed to have my name associated with this issue.

i think tomorrow i'm going to go out and buy one of his cd's because this guy deserves the support.

edit: forgot the link to the article:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/richard-marx-attacks-riaa-after-19m-th...as-verdict.ars

[hech54]

Richard's a good guy.