VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Hi,

    I'd like some info (general principles) regarding converting video to image sequences, particularly regarding quality. I suspect TGA is an all round ideal format? What about when converting from DVD (vob)? Is TGA overkill? Are JPGs adequate to the task? And Im correct in thinking PNGs have the same quality to JPGs (just the additional alpha channel)?

    Actually, whilst Im here... Does anyone know if Premiere or vdub offer an option to encode into image sequences only designated frames, e.g. every second frame (for rotoscoping use)? Will adjusting the output framerate do the trick?

    Thanks kindly!

    Richard.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Search Comp PM
    I've done it many times with Premiere, saving the sequence as a series of .bmp files that could be rotoscoped (or altered in other ways) using Photoshop. The series of .bmp files can thereafter be reimported into Premiere as a video clip and dropped back into the timeline. Consult your user's manual or Premiere's help file. If you want to remove frames, you simply pull out the individual .bmp files you do not want to use. (Each video frame produces its own .bmp image.)
    Quote Quote  
  3. .png has lossless compression and can preserve alpha channel. .jpg is lossy and should not be used. .tga and .bmp are lossless but not compressed.

    vdub can export a frame range. avisynth can also and has the most control, but you need some basic scripting knowledge beforehand
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by poisondeathray
    .jpg is lossy and should not be used
    It might be "adequate" for the OP's purpose.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks kindly for all the advice.

    Cheers,
    Richard
    Quote Quote  
  6. Originally Posted by richardjc
    Is TGA overkill?
    yes, bmp is just fine
    Originally Posted by richardjc
    Are JPGs adequate to the task?
    I'm affraid they're not
    Originally Posted by richardjc
    And Im correct in thinking PNGs have the same quality to JPGs (just the additional alpha channel)?
    Avoid jpeg & png by any means necessary, especially jpeg, png support the alpha chan yep
    Originally Posted by richardjc
    Does anyone know if Premiere or vdub offer an option to encode into image sequences only designated frames, e.g. every second frame (for rotoscoping use)? Will adjusting the output framerate do the trick?
    (on vdub) I don't think so but you could select a specific segment and add it to the job list and redo this operation at will then process the job(s)
    *** DIGITIZING VHS / ANALOG VIDEOS SINCE 2001**** GEAR: JVC HR-S7700MS, TOSHIBA V733EF AND MORE
    Quote Quote  
  7. 24 and 32 bit TGA, and BMP are more-or-less equivalent. Fewer programs can handle TGA, some can't handle RLE encoded (losslessly compressed) TGA. PNG output from VirtualDub is losslessly compressed.

    In VirtualDub You can use the Video -> Frame Rate option to decimate the image sequence output. You can use the mark-in and mark-out tools to break a video into segments.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!