off topic2

[bbb]

I don't like to see forums overrun and ruined by spammers and con-artists tricking naive newbies out of their money. I've been quiet about his tasteless self promoting ("Look HERE it's me the Great Shizzzon") postings for many many months until he decided to become a forum spammer, hyping his "dvd quality" "lossless quality on 1 cdr." Such antics would never be allowed in newsgroups. He would have his ISP would have canceled his account for such violations of newsgroups ... so why should he be allowed to advertise his baloney here?

As experts on this forum have said and proved with various templates and methods, "dvd quality" is not even possible on 2 vcds (its barely possible with 2 svcds), making his 1 vcd-x "svcd-dvd-like" quality claims pure misinformation. The fact that he refuses to provide video clips to demonstrate his supposed quality or a template for the past months shows that he is simply a con artist.

And, like you said, if you don't like my revealing posts about him, ignore them. The question is why are you so protective over Shizzzon? Are you related to him in anyway?

Finally, surely Shizzzon, as an individual, can speak for himself and finally prove to all the naysayers that he isn't just hyping himself and his templates to swindle a few dollars so he can buy some decent computer equipment and some real dvds (as oppossed to low quality camcorder movie theatre rips).

[bravo]

i'm sorry,i will not post in the advanced section.i thought it was the regular conversion section.my error.WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN

[resnullius]

i don't even know what continent he lives and i don'T really care it's just that i think you go a bit overboard. Ok you don't like him you think he should be kicked but i think your negativity is actually worst for these forums than anything he could do because you make any forum he's in into a war zone rather than an exchange of ideas. I've heard all your saying about him and i understand why he's become some what of a joke but he might actually have a good idea with his 99+songs on a svcd would be nice to see where he'll go with that. maybe he'll screw up again. But6 hey let's see. And anyways you'd discredit him better by not makling the attacks personnal. prove that what he says is wrong time and ab=gain and no one will listen to him but keep to the facts of what he's saying. not personnal attacks, thats what bugs me.

[sean madison]

Ironic to say but bbb is the spammer!

I have never said i can achieve dvd quality

I am not selling anything and i do not know where he is getting that info at.
I am not cheating anybody out of money since i am not selling anything.

I have never said this is the great shizzzon

I have never emailed any member here spamming.

To put it down into terms.

I am serious, if bbb says anything else that is 100% wrong, i will find out where u live and **** u up(kill is a better word)

U dont know how much a person can get pissed off of someone who totally lies about someone.

I can be seen as a psych person.

If u wanna die, u will so **** u and have a happy short life form now

[sean madison]

oh and let me respond to everything else bbb says,

Buy dvds rather than dl camcorder movie rips HAHA

U must think im stupid, cuz if u gonna bring that up, then u are stupid cuz that means u do it! haha

If anyone here has somethin better than 56k and still dls cam quality vids should be dl DVD SCRs haha

bbb, u so fuckin stupid.

a cam movie rip?
now u usin terms that dont make any sense.
there is no such as a cam movie rip, haha

besides, i dont dl cams

I dl TS from cam that has been re-filtered into a "so-so SCR"

CTP, TMMVCD, FREEDOM, TFO, TFE are only people who can make the best cams for their ts.

DVD-SCR are the best,

People let me help everyone out, do NOT listen to bbb as proven here he does not know shit and wont be on here for long! haha

[sean madison]

and let me make another reply since bbb makes tons of topics about me.

Why dont i put any pics to prove quality?

Do u really think that pics are the best way to prve quality?
haha u still fuckin stupid.

As mentioned before as i see u never mention anything that i ACTUALLY say, i am almost done revising my guide and i am for the 2nd time saying this putting 10 sec vid samples of a source vid, svcd-x version and vcd-x version so u can see the difference.

**** u bbb since u dont know shit

[adam]

a cam movie rip?
now u usin terms that dont make any sense.
there is no such as a cam movie rip, haha

I dl TS from cam that has been re-filtered into a "so-so SCR"

CTP, TMMVCD, FREEDOM, TFO, TFE are only people who can make the best cams for their ts.

Man that is classic. I'm not going to get into this "I'm going to kill you" discussion but let me just say to sean that you need to read the faq on this site before claiming others don't know the proper terminology for bootleg movie releases. After, what did you say 3 years of doing this you still don't know the difference between a cam, TS, and a SCR?

And Sean, everything bbb said IS true. You did claim your formats were lossless, you did try to sell your templates, and you did claim you were a great video encoder. Hell its written right under your name in every post you make. Also you don't have to e-mail someone to spam them. Personally I do consider %90 of your posts on this forum spam. Oh, and I guess I'll have to remind you for about the 100th time. Your SVCD-X format is a SVCD. You cannot re-release a worldwide accepted format and claim it as your own.

bbb, I can sypathize with you. If this were my site sean would have been gone a long time ago. However, I don't think posts like this really help anything, they only bring more attention to him.

[Tommy]

Its time for all of this stuff to end and for everyone to grow up.

[sean madison]

THANK U ADAM
SVCD-X IS SVCD

Someone FINALLY believes thats its not XSVCD

Since i do change the audio bitrate from 224 to 128 and its still standard!!

Thank god.

oh and u dont think i know the difference between that shit?
Cam video from cam using cam as audio source too
TS- using vid from cam but remux audio with clean audio stream such as from the hearing impaired
SCR- bootlegged copies of vhs\dvd sent off to critics or whoever that gets ripped off and put on the net

U happy now?
Do i have to answer everything

And it looks like adam is bein mislead too

I did say lossless didnt i? yes i did
Did i ever say anything about dvd? no, putting words in my mouth

Also, did it ever occur to u that i never mention my source.
I have never mentioned that so u dont know what i mean by lossless but a shit load of people i help love what i do.
This usualy means divx movies i have are lossless compared to encoded version
this also includes ts dvd-scr tc

I have never mentioned anything about dvd quality after i have encoded.
I'm tired of being fucked around here.
U know what, just **** everybody

Just do all of us a favor and stick to the simple term-
If u dont have anything nice to say, dont say shit

[adam]

You claimed you had a lossless format. That means that no quality is lost in converting to it regardless of the source. Whether the source is dvd, or a cam does not matter. You need to learn what the term lossless means before promoting your format as such.

Who ever said your "SVCD-X" format is an XSVCD? Everyone has been telling you since day 1 that you simply used low bitrate in a svcd. Lowering the audio bitrate from 224 to 128 does not affect compliancy since svcds support from 32 to 384kbits. You have created a svcd template for TMPGenc, nothing more. Furthermore there are dozens of templates similar to the one you created. To promote your template as a new format is idiotic but to attempt to charge money for it is shameless.

Well I see that you have read the faq now but that still doesn't explain how you can "re-filter a TS into a SCR."

Please don't take this the wrong way. I am not trying to instigate further arguments here but I have to call things as I see them. This thread never should have been posted, at least not publicly, and you have every right to defend yourself, however you need to defend yourself with facts and you have yet to do that.

[sean madison]

i didnt read the thing about cam and whatever

I've knwon that knowledge ever since i dl my first movie little nicky.
Centropy- i have talked to one of their encoders before so dont think im just retarded.

Also, according to u i havent invented anything on my svcd-x guide?

So u are saying, as long as the res is 480x480 and the fps is 29.97, i can change whatever else i want and it'll still be standard?

thats weird cuz i just tested what u said and it isnt correct

i encoded a part of special features of gone in 60 seconds dvd to svcd and this is even what i did-

I loaded the svcd ntsc temp then i unlocked it.
I went to video tab changed to CQ_VBR max 1800 qu 70
In advanced tab, i checked inverse telecine
In quantize matrix, i unchecked no motion search......
In audio tab i set it from 224 to 192.
Thats IT!!! thats all i changed.
I encode, import in nero and walla!!, you're wrong!
It says it is invalid!

I do it my way and walla, its valid!

U try it if u dont believe me.
Do exactly what i did, load svcd ntsc then unlock it.
Change all those settings just like that or u dont have to use inverse telecine and encode and dont change anything else.

See if i'm lyin or not.
If u still dont believe me, i'll make a video of what i did and prove to people that the svcd-x guide will show people how to keep svcd movies in standard longer!

[adam]

Sean this is getting ridiculous. Your idea of standard is laughable. You simply cannot use a program like Nero to test for compliancy. Nero is known to have numerous bugs in regards to what it considers compliant, besides the fact that its not even intended to be used as a compliancy checker. Nero probably disliked the 23.976fps you got after inverse telecining, however with the 3:2 pulldown the svcd would still be compliant. Or maybe its because TMPGenc doesnt always export a compliant svcd program stream and requires that the file be remultiplexed.

Please use a real program to test for compliancy such as philiips svcd verifier or better yet fork over some money and order the SVCD IEC specifications so you can save us all from this endless banter.

No you cannot change settings at whim and expect it to still be compliant and I don't know where you got that idea but it wasnt from one of my posts. If you want to keep your files compliant with the svcd standard then the first thing you need to do is LEARN WHAT THAT STANDARD IS!! I don't see how someone can claim to be a master at something and not even know the very basics.

No you have not invented anything with your SVCD-X format, how many times do I have to explain that to you!

[sean madison]

ahh i cant change things and still be compliant?

Well these embers will just see bout that at the end of this week now wont they

[tigerwolf]

Given I ended up opening this post, I guess I'll reply. Just with what I've seen.

oh and u dont think i know the difference between that shit?
Cam video from cam using cam as audio source too
TS- using vid from cam but remux audio with clean audio stream such as from the hearing impaired
SCR- bootlegged copies of vhs\dvd sent off to critics or whoever that gets ripped off and put on the net

actually I saw a post from you not to long ago inquiring what telesync was.

U happy now?
Do i have to answer everything

no but you haven't really answered anything that defends you, though you do like to try and use the power of misdirection in an attempt to win.

I did say lossless didnt i? yes i did
Did i ever say anything about dvd? no, putting words in my mouth

define the difference between lossless and not dvd quality? In this case, I rip a dvd, now for it to be truely lossless means that the svcd that I make has to be identical to the dvd I ripped, if the quality of the svcd is not the same quality as the dvd I ripped then it has incurred loss. But even in that case, when you did provide a clip of your format, people were saying that there was apparent loss of quality which you responded that is was a poor quality clip to start with, if you want to prove something take a quality clip and do your format on it, then provide both the original quality clip and the clip that was done via your method.

Also, did it ever occur to u that i never mention my source.
I have never mentioned that so u dont know what i mean by lossless but a shit load of people i help love what i do.
This usualy means divx movies i have are lossless compared to encoded version this also includes ts dvd-scr tc

But the quality of divx, and etc are of less quality in the first place. I mean even the guides tell you that converting from a divx movie don't even bother with high quality encoding, which means that your method may not truely effect the poor quality of the original clip because the original clip was a piece of shit to start with.

I have never mentioned anything about dvd quality after i have encoded.
I'm tired of being fucked around here.
U know what, just **** everybody

Just do all of us a favor and stick to the simple term-
If u dont have anything nice to say, dont say shit

From what I've noticed, majority of the people on here that are against you just want you to give valid proof to your statements. That appears to be all that most want, and if it doesn't pan out to be what you've stated admit that you might have been wrong or etc.

I've seen the posts where you asked for money for your template, where you wanted people to e-mail you, etc.

With most people I've found it doesn't take much to fix things. A simple apology, ignoring the posts by those that will be against you, and just continuing to post quality advice in an arena where your knowledge is and admitting when you don't know something or might be wrong.

From what I've seen, you have in a sense spammed (not e-mailer spamming), you have offered your format up for sale, you even admitted that you claimed your format lossless but never disclosed the source to which your claim was in regards, which would appear to be trickery, given you wanted to sell the format, you didn't disclose everything in hopes to make a little cash which is also considered fraud.

Though again, it doesn't take much with many people to make amends. Apologize, offer your format up for people to check out, etc. And just ignore those that will continue to try to make remarks, because there will always be a few that even after you make amends will strike at you, those are the ones you just ignore and move on.

[adam]

Do you even read the posts you respond to?

Of course you can change settings and still comply to a standard but you have to KNOW WHAT YOUR DOING FIRST.

The SVCD specs allow for a great deal of variety in regards to what settings you use. The default templates in TMPGenc are just that, templates. They are suggested settings, nothing more. There are thousands of possible combinations of settings you could use in TMPGenc, and you have apparantly come up with one so tell me again whats so special about it?

Instead of randomly changing settings and then testing compliancy in non-compliant software programs why not try learning what the SVCD standard is FIRST and then encode accordingly.

Please before responding again just do us all a favor and click on the WHAT IS SVCD link.