I confirm that 640x480 Xvid AVI is also converted to HQ mode. I have 10 videos with this format and upload to YT.
all can append "&fmt=6" to force to play in HQ mode, here is the play list of these 10 videos,
http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?p=13F7442D4A7498C3
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
Try StreamFab Downloader and download streaming video from Youtube, Netflix, Amazon! Download free trial.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 60 of 611
Thread
-
-
Originally Posted by yawoo
Are these uploads recent btw? Did you have to await awhile before they got converted? -
oh! sorry, this is the correct link.
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=13F7442D4A7498C3 -
Looks good. How long did you have to wait to get the HQ version to appear?
-
Well I uploaded a 640x480 XviD today on Youtube, and it did not get converted. Still only 4 of my 47 videos are converted. I wonder how long it will take for movies longer then 20-30 minutes to be converted.
Touchy sensitive dude :D. -
Originally Posted by stsin
If you want quality, you have to find your videos elsewhere or buy the video/music. I know of Artists who's entire album have been uploaded to youtube by their recording company. The logic must be , it's 22khz mono, so you're still going to buy the music. It is strange though that theyuse VBR audio for the LQ videos but CBR for HQ videos. Makes no sense. -
Originally Posted by atropine
It's also strange they're using lame 3.97 beta code, while there's stable code for it. 3.98 is in beta now.
Regarding the stereo-issue;
If it was that big of a problem for Viacom/BayTSP, then dailymotion, vimeo, blip, stage6, none of those would offer stereo. Also, there are many YT users with almost all of their vids in stereo http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=SHAYMCN for example. Even the YouTube owned production crew channels are offering stereo FLV. -
National Geographic also uses high bitrate stereo (I think they use 192kb/s or more). Atleast they have very good quality sound. So I really hope that Youtube will eventually upgrade to stereo. I don't see the problem why they wouldn't do that.
-
Originally Posted by Denizzje
And to reply to the message above. Yeah Youtube have always used variable bitrate for 320x240 videos. This is the output of an mp3 produced by the youtube encoder.
Bitrates:
----------------------------------------------------
32 0.1%
40 0.9%
48 |||||||||||| 13.2%
56 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 42.7%
64 |||||||||||||||||||||||| 25.9%
80 |||||| 7.1%
96 ||||||| 7.7%
112 | 1.6%
128 0.3%
144 0.2%
160 0.1%
----------------------------------------------------
Type : mpeg 2 layer III
Bitrate : 63
Mode : mono
Frequency : 22050 Hz
Frames : 3064
ID3v2 Size : 0
First Frame Pos : 0
Length : 00:01:20
Max. Reservoir : 52
Av. Reservoir : 15
Emphasis : none
Scalefac : 22.8%
Bad Last Frame : no
Encoder : FhG (fastenc)
Lame Header : No -
And what is the output of an mp3 by the new encoder?
Touchy sensitive dude :D. -
Originally Posted by Denizzje
----------------------------------------------------
96 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 100.0%
----------------------------------------------------
Type : mpeg 1 layer III
Bitrate : 96
Mode : mono
Frequency : 44100 Hz
Frames : 7569
ID3v2 Size : 0
First Frame Pos : 0
Length : 00:03:17
Max. Reservoir : 511
Av. Reservoir : 503
Emphasis : none
Scalefac : 88.7%
Bad Last Frame : no
Encoder : Gogo (after 3.0)
Lame Header : No -
also UMG uses Stereo...which is why i guess the video is usually BAD quality
-
Originally Posted by reez
Encoder : Gogo (after 3.0)
Lame Header : No
has the "LAME3.97 (beta)" tag in it, and MediaInfo says it's encoded by it.. So I don't think YouTube is using a Gogo codec. -
Originally Posted by bayme
if (data.scfsi) //scfsi used
{
if (data.scalefac > 0)
return guess = _T("Gogo (after 3.0)"); //could be new Lame... but then there should be a label. So likely GOGO.
else
return guess = _T("Lame (old) or m3e"); -
Just report from my friend that 512x384 XviD AVI can also be upgraded to HQ by youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOsGGFD5FGU&fmt=6 -
Ok folks, my latest, all my recent uploads now displaying full screen and much better quality. (sorry as yet all set to private as theyre unedited tests) I dont do HD or sterio sound so i wont elaberate on those areas, nevertheless they are a vast improvment on the initial uploads.
For those of you interested, and to all of those who want to keep it simple (as i am one of those who doesnt understand the tech guys methods and i don't have an .flv renderer, well, i do actually, but i am still doing my best to undersand and learn to use Sony Vegas 8 Pro so lets not go there, here are my settings for rendering to .wmv)
video recorded using solid state equipment, (shakes a bit in the helicopter)
Sandisk v mate memory card recorder with a 2GB Extreme 3 SD card (will hold 4 hours at these settings)
v mate set to record in PAL (me in uk) @ 640x480 25FPS high quality
pal 320 TV line bullet camera (wide angle lens)
project saved on pc via card reader (they are .mp4 files) but i'm assuming any source will do...
project created in Sony vegas 8 pro for editing
rendered as .wmv files
640x480 @ 30 FPS using vegas's 3M download template that is then changed to 1M (thats the vid bit rate)
giving sound @ 96 bitrate 44100 sterio (please note not sure if it results in sterio as i've shorted it out to mono)
100 sharpest (video quality render)
1 minute file size before upload = 7.64 MB
uploaded normally to you tube, initially low quality....
Waited 24 hours and... BINGO!...
ALL PLAYING AT HIGHER QUALITY. and FULL VIEWING PANE
I'm not technically minded so please, no picking at my lingo or weird british way of speaking! -
yahar i SEE the accent..so far none of my .mov/avi files(uploaded today) are HQ
-
Well, at least we have proof that the null frame trick still works. ^_^
http://youtube.com/watch?v=6bb0sOqEdcI
LOL, video games.... -
Originally Posted by SpongeFreak52
-
It's where you pad 3/4 of the video with empty frames in order to distribute the bitrate to the actual video.
-
Originally Posted by SpongeFreak52
I used sorenson squeeze with 2 pass variable bitrate to make my flv, I had content in the first part and black screen and no sound in the 2nd half. I only raised the bitrate to 450kbit, but youtube still re-encoded. Total video length was 6mins (3mins content/3mins black) -
Originally Posted by SpongeFreak52
What bitrate you suggest to encode for good quality 480x360 FLV from your experience? -
Originally Posted by yawoo
Unless you really desire high quality atm, I'd say wait until YT upgrades your vids to HQ.
Originally Posted by gus999
My guess is that they're re-encoding videos randomly or in some order atm, either by video format or by channel. -
hey i just thought i'd let you know
http://youtubestatus.blogspot.com/2008/02/s.html -
Still no more movies of me have been switched to HQ . That maintenance of above has already been done right?
-
Wonderpierrot, did you give it 24 hours to upgrade?
If it does happen, please let us know...
Perhaps i'm just hitting the right buttons with my test videos.
If i discover anything else, i'll be sure to post my findings here... -
Is it already possible to download the HQ movies btw? If so, how do I get them ?
Touchy sensitive dude :D. -
Originally Posted by Denizzje
For Firefox that would be located at:
%appdata%\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\your-profile-name.default\Cache\
and then just pick out the newest file while you're watching it and after it has finished downloading in YT's player. Copy to a different folder and rename to *.flv -
Originally Posted by bayme
Never mind, got it with Internet Explorer . Thanks. Btw, I see it comes directly from Google instead of Youtube... I download it from some strange Google location.
Similar Threads
-
Is this the highest possible quality for YouTube? YouTube compresses video?
By chrissyelle in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 17Last Post: 5th Oct 2010, 11:33 -
Alternatives to YouTube - new site offering direct comparisons
By Karel Bata in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 18Last Post: 3rd Feb 2010, 13:57 -
Higher Bitrate = Higher Quality? - 20MBPS difference for 1080p file
By SgtPepper23 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 6th Dec 2009, 07:57 -
"Watch This Video In Higher Quality" Link On YouTube
By Leonardo in forum Video Streaming DownloadingReplies: 3Last Post: 10th Apr 2008, 15:03 -
which scenario gives a higher quality video?
By graysky in forum DVD RippingReplies: 19Last Post: 3rd Sep 2007, 10:40