I think Somebodeez' post is very illuminating.
Somebodeez had posted this as a screen capture on this site before.
(here: https://forum.videohelp.com/topic293217-30.html#1466481)
Try plugging in that URL you see there in that picture.
The RIAA has removed it.
Meaning, they have changed their collective minds on how they feel about converting CD material from WAV to MP3 files.
Sorry there RIAA. You can't have it both ways.
At least, not in my book.
Not that I care anymore, I have all the purchased CDs I care for now - not likely I will need any more.
So, nyah nyah.![]()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 37 of 37
-
Whatever doesn't kill me, merely ticks me off. (Never again a Sony consumer.)
-
The RIAA's rebuttal:
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9839897-7.html
What I think they are doing is intentionally slipping "ripping is stealing" comments into the testimony in the easy cases. When enough of these cases are decided in their favor they will point back at the "ripping is stealing" quotes and say the courts agreed with them. Then will come the attacks on ripping for personal use. -
What I would like to know is how much money the RIAA has actually paid back to the artists compared to how much that they have won in court? I'm betting its less than 3%
-
While I am not saying you are wrong, Jagabo, just how do you think the RIAA is going to know just who is ripping from CDs onto some other media?
Have they bugged my computer? Yours? The neighbor's kid down the street?
If none of us are making them available outside of our own personal possession, they can't possibly know for a fact this "ripping" occurs.
Even so, I find the notion of embedding "ripping is stealing" throughout their various (if unethical) 'wins' so they can get a future condition just right to make it a legal binding case ... probably correct.
As we head towards even more of a Big Brother (is watching you) State - - I can't help but wonder of anyone of any substance is going to try and prevent it.
Other than us blathering about it, of course.Whatever doesn't kill me, merely ticks me off. (Never again a Sony consumer.) -
The RIAA tries to broaden the language in the lawsuits they file no doubt because they would like to try to use these suits as "case law" on future lawsuits. The results of previous lawsuits are used as a means of arguing a new case based on prior rulings. This "case law" has some legitimacy in a court in that it establishes how a ruling was previously made. So when these slime artists slip their broader language into a given case's arguments, they will subsequently attempt to use it a "case law".
-
Originally Posted by painkiller
-
Originally Posted by rkr1958
) usage.
Similar Threads
-
Longevity of CDs and DVDs? Are my old CDs starting to lose it?
By garybeck in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 15Last Post: 25th Jan 2013, 13:38 -
Problems copying CDs on Mac
By Nilfennasion in forum MacReplies: 3Last Post: 3rd Jul 2009, 08:15 -
Help Posting an AVI Video Online
By michellem in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 7Last Post: 11th May 2009, 20:11 -
Watch movies online with other online also at the same time?
By Ghtpua in forum Software PlayingReplies: 5Last Post: 11th Feb 2008, 13:02 -
Help with copying & editing personal basketball video
By Skydiver6 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 9Last Post: 14th Jan 2008, 09:16