VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Search Comp PM
    Hey, ive stumbled over this recently...,

    why are some using a format called 960x544 ??
    wouldnt it make moer sense to use 960x540 whis is exactly half of 1980x1080

    Am i missing out on something?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UNREACHABLE
    Search Comp PM
    544 is an integer multiple of 8, 540 is not.

    \\\\\
    Quote Quote  
  3. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by squadjot
    Hey, ive stumbled over this recently...,

    why are some using a format called 960x544 ??
    wouldnt it make moer sense to use 960x540 whis is exactly half of 1980x1080

    Am i missing out on something?
    960x544 has a ratio extremely close (off by a hundredth of a decimal point) to 16:9. Someone either had a 1280x720 or a 1980x1080 source that they reduced the resolution on but kept the same aspect ratio.

    960x544 (or 960x540 if you prefer - it makes no significant difference) is NOT "exactly half" of 1980x1080. This is a common math error. It is actually almost one fourth (1/4) because what you have is a situation of 1980 being cut in half (roughly) to 960 and 1080 being cut in half to 544 (or 540) and 2 x 2 = 4, so it's about one fourth. Or put another way:
    960 x 544 = 522240
    1980 x 1080 = 2138400
    2138400 / 522240 = 4.09 (let's round that off to 4)
    so 960 x 544 is one fourth the size of 1980 x 1080.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!