VideoHelp Forum




Closed Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by cowboyup910 View Post
    Originally Posted by usually_quiet View Post
    Ever since ImgBurn was released, members here have been praising it, and saying it is better for burning DVD video than Nero, but I have yet to hear an explanation as to why this is so.

    I have been using Nero for a couple of years, and have had good results, as long as I used quality media. I have used ImgBurn too, and it's fine, but I haven't found anything I like more about it, other than the additional choices available for burn speed. Just curious as to what the other reasons its fans have for preferring ImgBurn.

    Then continue using Nero. Why would one want to pay for burning when its free? Nero is full of crapware and lost the simple things like just burning.
    The version of Nero I was using was not only provided to me for free with my burner, but was also a stripped-down older version, not the latest full version, and was not particularly bloated.

    Anybody else wishing to discuss the faults and merits of these applications can start his own thread. This thread served its purpose 3 years ago as far as I am concerned and I'm asking the mods to close it.

  2. Mod Neophyte redwudz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    I think this thread has run it's course. Closed.

    Moderator redwudz




Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!