Are you watching on a progressive display - a widescreen television set? If so, then your player or TV set does a horrible job of deinterlacing it. If the player is set for progressive scan, you might try outputting 480i instead and having the TV set deinterlace it to see if it looks any better. If you're watching on a regular interlaced TV set, then you shouldn't see any blends or double images at all. Maybe I'm missing something, I don't know, but that VOB looked normal to me.Originally Posted by forare
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 33 of 33
-
-
I don't know, but that VOB looked normal to me.
-
Thanks, MysticE. I was thinking of making a little MiniDVD out of it for testing on my standalone, but was lazy. You confirmed what I suspected to be true. That still doesn't solve forare's problem, though. I can maybe explain the problem if he's using a widescreen TV set. I can't explain it if he's using a regular old interlaced CRT set. Unless - unless this VOB isn't from the final DVD he created for playing on his standalone.
Similar Threads
-
slow motion by interlaced to progressive conversion?
By menczel in forum Video ConversionReplies: 9Last Post: 24th Apr 2011, 10:39 -
Converting DV to H.264 and comparing interlaced/de-interlaced
By amirh1 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 5Last Post: 23rd Jun 2010, 09:16 -
encode interlaced material witth ffmepg to MPEG2 but get progressive output
By Massa in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 9Last Post: 13th Jan 2009, 12:42 -
Conversion to Progressive Scan from Interlaced DV. Necessary?
By Anonymous4 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 13th Nov 2008, 14:34 -
progressive footage encoded as interlaced mpeg2
By misapito in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 9Last Post: 4th Mar 2008, 08:44