VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Greetings...Are there any cases when I should not de-interlace? It seems that if I encode as MPEG1 and do not interlace, I always seem to get combing artifacts. If I de-interlace, encode as MPEG-1, and burn...it seems to look OK. I normally capture AVI clips from my Digital and Analog CamCorders as 720x480 and 704x480 respectively. Should I always de-interlace? I am ultimately going go the DVD burning route, so if I encode as MPEG-2, do I still need to de-interlace?

    Any advice would be appreciated
    Quote Quote  
  2. Mpeg2 is interlace.
    For Mpeg1 I use deinterlace, interpolation. It makes a motion blur effect and looks good on the tv.
    Quote Quote  
  3. MPEG2 supports interlaced content as well as progressive (MPEG1 is only progressive).
    You typically will get better results with deinterlacing turned on even for MPEG2 at low bitrates (SVCD).
    Quote Quote  
  4. Sulik,

    Are you using Tmpgenc (2.5 ???) for encoding? If yes, what kind of deinterlacing are you using for SVCD?
    Quote Quote  
  5. I do most of my captures in MMC 7.5, since it has a very good deinterlacing (better than TMPGENC).

    I personally don't really care for TMPGENC (don't flame me).
    Even with 2-pass VBR or CQ VBR, the quality of I-frames is very good, but B frames are very bad, and P-frames somewhere in the middle.

    I found the VBR in MMC better at keeping a constant quality accross all frames. The only advantage I see in TMPGENC or other non-realtime encoders is the possibility to use preprocessing filters.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!