VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Queens
    Search Comp PM
    Ok here is the magical question. I'm about to buy this Hitachi 0A34915 1TB 7200Rpm 32MB Cache SATA II Hard Drive. It's 32MB cache. So if I have a file that is 4.7GB compressed and I want to unzip it, will my speed be fast. How fast will it unzip? I have now windows Vista 64 with 4GB memory. Just curious how fast will it take. I'm currenlty using Powerarchiever 2007. Thanks
    Quote Quote  
  2. aBigMeanie aedipuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    666th portal
    Search Comp PM
    no faster then any other 7200rpm drive. the cache is only useful for small frequently accessed files. for working with large files sustained read/write speed is what's important. faster if you read from one physical drive and write to a separate physical drive.
    --
    "a lot of people are better dead" - prisoner KSC2-303
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by aedipuss
    faster if you read from one physical drive and write to a separate physical drive.
    No two ifs, ands, or buts about it. No drive will like to read and write to itself. Do youself a favor and buy two 500gb drives. Probably be cheaper anyway.
    Have a good one,

    neomaine

    NEW! VideoHelp.com F@H team 166011!
    http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=166011

    Folding@Home FAQ and download: http://folding.stanford.edu/
    Quote Quote  
  4. Vista does something that many would consider stupid (surely not!)

    I discovered this when trying to unzip a very large archive on an external drive and it would keep failing. Here's why:

    When you use Vista's built-in capability to uncompress a zip file, for some reason it unzips it to the system's TMP folder (e.g., C:\TMP). Once unzipped, it copies everything to your target location. Why? I have no idea. It makes the whole process painfully slow since so much stuff has to be copied from one place to another. But my problem was that I was running low on disk space and so it couldn't complete the uncompression.

    Here's the key bit - let's say you have a system drive C: and two external drives D: and E:. You want to unzip a 4.7GB file from D: to E: Both drives have plenty of free space but C: has 2GB. The unzipping will fail and you will scratch your head for ages wondering why - unless you know the above 'secret'. The steps that occur are:

    Unzip from D: to C:
    Copy the uncompressed version from C: to E: unless C: doesn't have enough space.

    If you cannot free up enough space on C:, the solution is to change the location of the TMP folder. In my case, I changed it to a different partition on my main drive.

    In a similar manner, you may wonder why so much space is used by Vista. By default, Vista uses a paging file (pagefile.sys - just like other Windows) and can get quite big (a few GB if you have a lot of RAM). But it also uses a hibernation file (hiberfil.sys) which will be at least as big as your RAM. That's a lot of space used up. If you don't want to use hiberation, disable it and that enormous file will go away, freeing up a lot of valuable disk space. I came across this when I installed more RAM and my system partition went into the red.
    John Miller
    Quote Quote  
  5. Originally Posted by JohnnyMalaria
    When you use Vista's built-in capability to uncompress a zip file, for some reason it unzips it to the system's TMP folder (e.g., C:\TMP). Once unzipped, it copies everything to your target location. Why? I have no idea.
    Many archiving programs do that. Damn annoying.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!