VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. is it better then the Divx/XviD codec?

    Thanks!!!
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    Should be more efficient, yes (same quality/lower bitrate or better quality/same bitrate) but reportedly takes "forever" to encode with, and playback support is much less. It all boils down to what you mean by "better".

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Triptonia
    Search Comp PM
    reportedly takes "forever" to encode with...

    Perhas thinking of h.264...

    h.263
    'A video compression scheme defined by the ITU, originally for use in video telephony and related systems; particularly suited to operation at very low rates'

    Mpeg4 is considered an evolution on h.263.

    FLV contains an H263 variant in sorenson spark (SVQ), although it's reported that the latest SVQ3 is a tweaked h.264.
    (FLV can also contain on VP6 since flash 8.)

    A link with some info on h263
    http://www.h263l.com
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by 45tripp
    reportedly takes "forever" to encode with...

    Perhas thinking of h.264...
    Ah - yes! I should read more closely.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  5. thanks for your reply...
    so according to what you're saying its better...

    what about compatibility with my DVD Player?
    (Pioneer DV-383)
    is it recgonized as Divx\XviD?
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by GangstaRap
    is it recgonized as Divx\XviD?
    Highly unlikely.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  7. mats.hogberg, OK Thanks man!
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!