A CRT is different from fixed pixel displays like plasma and LCD. Like a CRT computer monitor, a CRT TV can scan various numbers of lines behind a shadow mask. A CRT TV can also scan interlace or progressive. An HD CRT typically scans either 1080i (540 lines per field) or 480p sometimes 720p. Viewable resolution is limited by the shadow mask (800x600 to 1024x720 typ.)Originally Posted by gll99
Plasma and LCD are fixed pixel resolution and always progressive. 1024x768 is a typical native display resolution for a plasma, 1366x768 is typical for LCD and some plasma. Some models are available with a native display resolution up to 1920x1080. The key points for these TV sets are display resolution is always fixed and scan is always progressive. Input resolutions of 480i, 480p, 720p and 1080i are scaled in each TV to the native display resolution. 480i and 1080i must be deinterlaced. The quality of the deinterlace and scaling in the TV electronics determines the quality of the 480i and 1080i channels (most of them). Lower priced Plasma and LCD sets are known for poor display quality for 480i in particular. Evaluate 480i performance before you buy. 80% plus of what you watch is 480i.
PS: Commercial movie DVDs are typically progressive 720x480p. A good progressive DVD player will have great performance with HD CRT, LCD or plasma sets when set for 480p progressive and connected analog component (YPbPr) or digital component (HDMI). Upscaling players might look a bit better if set to 1080i for CRT or 720p for medium resolution LCD or plasma. Mileage will vary.
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 46 of 46
Thread
-
-
Take a look at the Olevia 532H and 537H. I wouldn't really recommend the 532H because it uses a different video processor and has few inputs and options and a lesser warranty but it's close to your price range and still pretty decent. The 537H however uses a better processor, gives a great picture, has lot's of inputs, 1 year in home warranty and as others have already pointed out you'd really want at least a 37" widescreen to replace a 32" standard TV anyway. You can get it for about $735 with free shipping at buy.com. It does have a few little quirks like a 15 second start up time, 2 seconds to change channels, have to scroll through the entire list of inputs to get to the one you want, limited PIP options (ie TV can only be paired with HDMI) and it has a small but bright blue LED next to the power button that stays on when the TV is off but you can't beat the picture quality for the price, or probably twice the price, even SD channels look very good. AVSforum has a long thread about these, and other, models and there are several reviews online as well.
If you happen to have a Sam's club membership, you might also be interested in the Vizio TVs. I haven't seen them in person but lot's of people on AVS seem to like them and Sam's has a really good return policy.
Looks like the price has gone back up at buy.com but buydig and beach camera have it for $734 with free shipping now. -
Originally Posted by edDV
-
Having viewed each additional post to this thread for some weeks now, I'm still convinced that CRT is a better deal all around if you're viewing mixed video sources. CRT does have size and weight limitations, of course; if you want a 42" set, etc., CRT is out of the question.
A really nice performing LCD or plasma costs plenty. Current pricing just doesn't seem to be worth the expense. But this weekend I toured a high-end a/v shop I haven't visited in quite a while. They have some 32" and bigger LCD's displayed there in the $5000-plus range. Not much noise in those units, but by golly I still see a lot of detail missing from the image, as well as oversaturated color and some colors missing altogether. I viewed a program with CNN newscasters on air, then an HDTV movie broadcast, and the frustrated sales guy was nice enough to play a bit of an HD-DVD movie for me; everyone looked as if they were wearing a ton of makeup -- no definition in the faces or clothing, and shadows in the background blocked up, plus too much edge sharpening, etc. I played with the image setting menus -- just couldn't get accurate flesh tones out of any of the sets, period.
For many folks these deficiencies don't seem to matter, just as many people think all audio amplifiers "sound alike". For those who can't see or hear a difference, I'm envious: I could save a lot of trouble and $$$ if I weren't so touchy about it!Last edited by sanlyn; 20th Mar 2014 at 09:57.
-
You can get the Sony 34" widescreen XBR CRT, the top of the line TVs, for $600 with free shipping from CC today and tomorrow. I'm not a real fan of Sony reliability, but the XBR TVs have pretty incredibile PQ.
http://www.circuitcity.com/ccd/productDetail.do?oid=147206&catOid=-12868&c=1&cm_re=main%20marquee-_-No%20interest%20for%2012%20months%20on%20TVs%20$29 9%20and%20up-_-Sony%2034 -
Originally Posted by gshelley61
CONSUMER ALERT: This TV has an analog broadcast tuner and will require a converter box after February 17, 2009 to receive over-the-air broadcasts with an antenna because of the nation's transition to digital broadcasting. The TV should continue to work as before with cable and satellite TV services, gaming consoles, VCRs, DVD players, and similar products.
==
She has just basic cable (no box) & no OTA antenna. She just needs small TV that can handle basic stuff & hopefully still work after 2009. Admittedly, I'm still a bit confused with some of this, since my home setup is current already(HDTV, Digital cable box, etc) -
I would to to a store and have a look at some of these TV's before drawing any conclusions. I own a 32" Sony CRT TV, a Panasonic 17" LCD SDTV, and a LG 20" LCD HDTV.
I am not sure about satellite, but with cable the FCC has mandated that even analog cable has to be supplied with local broadcasts in HD. It requires a QAM tuner to receive these HD programs which is why I chose an LG. The other choice was a Toshiba. I have set the LG next to the Sony to compare. The performance is closer than I would have expected plus the freedom from noise and the sharpness is very nice.
The Panasonic is an older TC-17LA1 LCD and does not fair well against either the new LG LCD or the Sony CRT TV.
[edit1]This was my second choice.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/p:Toshiba%2019HLV87%20Television:1994676818:page=details;_yl...NlYwNzaWJzcGVj
but the LG has dropped to $409 with free shipping at Circuit City's online store.
[edit2]CBC
CONSUMER ALERT: This TV has an analog broadcast tuner and will require a converter box after February 17, 2009 to receive over-the-air broadcasts with an antenna because of the nation's transition to digital broadcasting. The TV should continue to work as before with cable and satellite TV services, gaming consoles, VCRs, DVD players, and similar products. -
Thanks that's what I thought too (the tuners). The copy/paste was from Amazon site. May just have been a mistake
-
The picture after Feb 2009 is this:
An ATSC tuner will be required to get over the air digital broadcasts. Older analog TV sets will need an external ASTC tuner to get over the air broadcasts.
Cable will continue to have two digit analog channels that will work as before without a cable box. The number of analog channels will decrease over time since each takes the space of ~10 MPeg2 SD or 2 MPeg2 HD cable premium channels. The FCC minimum is the "locals" need to be carried in analog.
Local digital channels (SD and HD) will be available to a QAM tuner even with basic cable service. Premium digital channels (three digit) are encrypted and require either a cable box or cable card to decrypt.
Satellite tuners won't change much. Analog output conversions of the sat digital channels will continue to be offered.
Best solution for a new TV is get one with an analog NTSC tuner, an ATSC digital tuner and a QAM digital tuner. Optional is cable card capability. -
Originally Posted by edDV
Last edited by sanlyn; 20th Mar 2014 at 09:58.
-
yes, thanks. Seems that that Toshiba 20" would be a good choice for her then.
-
Originally Posted by samijubal
190lbs .be sure you have health insurance to cover back surgery .lol -
Originally Posted by MJA
-
Best Buy just got in the Samgsung TXT3093WH
$539.00 plus tax.
ASTC but No QAM tuner, no DVI or PC input.
The Sound Leveler seems to work nicely.
The Universal Remote works the Panasonic DVD player. The buttons on the remote are well laid out, intuitive and have a nice feel.
The poor cable signal is exposed by this tube but DVD's look quite nice. There is even a Black Level adjustment for HDMI inputs. -
Originally Posted by samijubal
The SONY 34 inch XBR at Circuit City is a good price. I paid $1365.00 for my 32 inch XBR back in 1995.
Similar Threads
-
Best 'bang for buck' GPU for PowerDirector 9 Ultra?
By rocknrolla in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 4th Jan 2011, 12:27 -
MKV player, best bang for my buck
By gold2040 in forum Media Center PC / MediaCentersReplies: 4Last Post: 29th Dec 2010, 12:24 -
Buck bang opinions
By kippard in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 5Last Post: 25th Dec 2008, 10:26 -
best bang for buck
By fergy05 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 1st Jul 2007, 22:35 -
Best Bang for Buck in Upconverting DVD Player
By golfnut in forum DVD & Blu-ray PlayersReplies: 3Last Post: 29th Jun 2007, 17:40