Have been reading with enthusiasm review of capture devices and Canopus ADVC-100 (no longer available new) is tops. The ADVC-300 that is more than twice the price has lesser marks in reviews. Canopus now offers the ADVC-110 (looks more like the older ADVC-50) while the still available ADVC-300 looks more like the older ADVC-100. Has anyone experience with the newer model?
Raja Abusharr
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
-
The major difference between the 100 and the 110 is the 110 doesn't require power if you have it connected to a 6 pin firewire port.
-
Its cheaper. I just wondered if I will get the wonderful device that so many people brag about if I purchase the 110 new. I am afraid to purchase a used one on ebay particularly if there has been voltage problems like some of the posts indicate.
THe other contenders in the $150-$250 price are (1) Pinnacle PCI Studio and (2) AceDVio card. All three seem to do the same thing but I was mostly concerned about audio/video syncing as my current system (mobo firewire input from miniDV) is dropping frames like crazy even though eveyrthing else is up to par with the system (as described in FAQ) -
Originally Posted by Raja Abusharr
Or are you saying there is a problem only with audio when capturing analog with the camcorder?
If the audio is in sync at the ADVC input it will keep the audio in sync with video. It won't correct a problem coming in over analog. -
When I hooked up the Sony DCR-pc120 to the computer, using both WMM as well as other capture software, the frames were being dropped so that the saved file appeared to be in fast motion. I then added a second internal 7200 drive and had some resolution but the output was still choppy. I am assuming that a dedicated input into the computer in the form of the canopus or other device would alleviate the problem. I cannot see anything else in my setup that would be the bottleneck. The system is very lean and runs fast.
-
There should be no audio/video sync problems when using the advc device. I own a advc 100 and have had no problems when hooking it up via firewire to my pc. You may want to try SCENALYZER LIVE to do your capturing instead of WINDOWS MOVIE MAKER.
-
Can someone perhaps advise me if the following hardware items will all do essentially the same thing (give or take some features)
1. Matrox RT.X2 ($1700-2000)
2. Canopus AceDVio board ($250)
3. Canopus ADVC-110 ($240) -
Originally Posted by Raja Abusharr
Try WinDV for capture. It cuts out all the middle levels of software and runs IEEE-1394 capture from DirectShow. If you still have problems, the problem is with the computer or the camcorder. Next try a different camcorder if possible. Or try your camcorder on a different computer.
You shouldn't be having dropped frames with that equipment. -
Is it possible that the miniDV tapes are low quality? I am using a Sony brand labeled "premium" but recently found out that there are three or four levels "higher" up than this particular brand. The captions for them refer to "decreased dropped frames" particularly in the ones that have IC chips in the cassettes.
I will try WinDV and your other ideas are good too. Thanks. -
Originally Posted by Raja Abusharr
Similar Threads
-
Macrovision and Canopus ADVC 110
By nikgelfi in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 2Last Post: 13th Apr 2011, 16:09 -
Canopus ADVC-100 vs Canopus ADVC-110
By tarrickb in forum Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD/HD)Replies: 20Last Post: 16th Oct 2010, 20:52 -
JVC HM-DH30000U + ADVC-110 or ADVC-300
By cadguy4u in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 13th Jan 2009, 13:29 -
Canopus ADVC-55 vs. ADVC-110
By bcags7 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 4Last Post: 2nd Nov 2008, 15:15 -
ADVC-110 and Vista
By shkinnybob in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 3Last Post: 3rd Aug 2007, 16:23