VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. ok - a little history:

    as far as video on an ipod, and especially wanting to crank out the best for tv,

    ipod 5g resolutions:
    h.264: 320px*240px - max. period.
    mpg4: 480px*480px - with that catch that this is a total product dimension.

    explanation (in 4:3 terms):

    480*480 (w*h) = 230400px^2. as long as your dimensions (w*h) multiply to </= (less than or equal to) 230,400px^2, you can use other resolutions (and better).

    so, anyone knowing simple math with recognize
    480px:480px (what apple says) = 1:1 (square, not much use).

    4:3 = 512px:384px,
    512px*384px = 196,608px^2,
    196,608px^2 </= 230,400px^2...

    this is better than
    4:3 = 480px:360px,
    480px*360px = 172,800px^2
    172,800px^2 </= 230,400px^2

    (with the added rule of keep everything nice and neat with the divisible-by-16 macroblock...)

    note that the next step up
    4:3 = 576px:432px
    576px*432px = 248,832px^2 and
    248,832px^2 is not </= 230,400px^2

    so, 4:3 theoretically caps, for 5g resolutions at 512px*384px (w*h)
    and an explanation (in 16:9 terms):

    from above:
    480*480 (w*h) = 230400px^2. as long as your dimensions (w*h) multiply to </= (less than or equal to) 230,400px^2, you can use other resolutions (and better).

    so, let's go with

    16:9 = 640px:360px, and while
    640px*360px exactly = 230,400px^2, it breaks the divisible-by-16 rule:
    640/16 = 40 (whole number, cool).
    360/16 = 22.5 (not a whole number, uncool).

    so, saving you some trial and error or extra math:

    16:9 = 512px:288px
    512px*288px = 147,456px^2
    and this pacifies the
    147,456px^2 </= 230,400px^2

    and 147,456px^2 is better than

    480px*270px = 129,600px^2

    and, unfortunanely, the next up, 768px*432px, doesn't come anywhere near being in the right range (331,776px^2)
    and obvious, 2.35:1 dimensions and more will follow this similar trend).

    now:

    ipod 5.5g resolutions (5g's can play with firmware update):
    h.264: 640px*480px
    mpg4: 640px*480px

    now, from my brief experimenting (and very lengthy) with 5.5g h.264, it would appear no matter how you do the dimensions, nothing wider than 640 will work (i tried 656, and would not move over to my ipod, and yes, the ipod is 5.5g; also tried 624 wise, and it worked as well)...

    now, for my question:
    does mpg4 x640 suffer the same limitation as h.264, in that no matter what you do, you can't get wider than 640?

    my math:
    640px:480px is 4:3, so you can't do better than that.
    but, if the prior 480px*480px rule carries over, we can get a little bit of benefit for widescreen and anamorphic...

    640px*480px = 307,200px^2. anything under this amount, if this theory proves true, should work.

    so,

    16:9 = 736px:414px
    736px*414px = 304,704px^2, and
    304,704px^2 </= 307,200px^2
    so, does the old rule still ring true?

    will a 736px*414px video work on my video ipod? (max that res out a bit more...)

    (i could experiment, but i figure there's someone with a more definitive knowledge that knows and can shed light on this mystery math.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member GMaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Hi,
    I've done some Nero Digital stuff 704x304 (2.35:1) without any playback problems on my 5G with the 1.2 firmware.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    The smaller H264 spec is not "320x240 max.period". It is 76,800 pixels in whatever dimensions using the rule of 16's. 368x208 is a perfectly valid set of dimensions that drop into the iPod and play just fine. (No, 656x112 I haven't tried.)

    I assume you want >640 width for the LC (low-complexity) encoding because you have a wide-screen TV?

    I haven't tried anything wider that 640 as I have only a standard format TV. If >640 width doesn't work, it's probably because Apple is not yet ready to make that jump. Remember that they are still trying to put into place all the partnerships they need for a truly successful movie store. If they jump the gun and permit >640 pixels, some of the studies may balk. Of course, once the partners are in place, expect a wide-screen (6G?) iPod and the iTV.

    It's funny but it may be Apple that really drives the adoption of wide-screen TVs. (Of course, your Mac already has such a screen so the golden convergence may center around the 24" iMac (and the 30" unit that's coming late next year).
    Quote Quote  
  4. thanks for the correction and insight.

    gmaq, i will give mpg4 a whirl...

    vb
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!