Or wait another 6 months for the "Won't Change My Mind, Honest to God Final Vision, Director's Cut" release.overloaded_ide wrote:
I have SEVERAL DVDs I am going to re-author, it was nice they gave me the deleated scenes as extra's so I can put them back in where they belong!!!
Alternatively, you could just wait a few weeks for the extended director's cut to be released!
8)
Personally I'm waiting for the version where you the audience tell the characters what to do..... :P
Try StreamFab Downloader and download from Netflix, Amazon, Youtube! Or Try DVDFab and copy Blu-rays! or rip iTunes movies!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 61 to 90 of 246
Thread
-
-
Originally Posted by edDV
Darryl -
I find myself more and more being turned off by the current shows and movies.
There are a LOT of good classic movies and shows that have never been released onto VHS, let alone DVD.
And if they never see the light of day on BluRay or HD either, I don't see myself getting all that excited or impressed about these new formats until the prices drop down and there's a format "winner".
Even then, there absolutely must be simplicity and freedom in usage without having to be tied to the internet or checking to see if it "approves" of my TV before the movie plays (or not) ect.
We don't even have an HDTV yet because there are still too many issues with them at this time. -
Could it be possible that as a technology these Blue Ray and HD DVD, that the biggest appeal will be to for those of us who want a disc that we can put significantly more data on?
As for content, even at Standard Definition, like today's DVD's, I could see the appeal when it comes to box sets. Just imagine, One DVD holds a whole season's worth of a tv show. All 8 Seasons of Little House On The Prairie on 8 Discs at maybe 200 bucks for the whole thing. Now if they combine that with something like an armour plating technology that the discs nearly indestructable, that would be really neat. Though Hollywood would make alot more stringing the DVD's out a little a time on alot more discs. Like $20 bucks for one episode of Columbo on vhs. I can't remember how that was now, you pay so much for the first tape and then after take additional ones at certain prices. They must of made millions stringing things out like that.
Maybe the size of the discs will come in handy when Titanic and Star Wars get coverted to 3D, I would think that you would need a big disc to hold something like that. I would imagine it would look really neat to see some of these big block busters in 3D. -
Originally Posted by Tom Saurus
-
Originally Posted by somebodeezHis name was MackemX
What kind of a man are you? The guy is unconscious in a coma and you don't have the guts to kiss his girlfriend? -
Originally Posted by somebodeez
They honestly believe that renting movies and burning them does not harm anyone even when done for strictly personal usage(the typical excuse as they loan them to friends) or that streaming the output of copyrighted material to a recording device for permanent archival of unpurchased footage is their god given right. There are even people who go as far as to believe that it's not stealing. Even more sad is some people still believe that if they pay for broadcast television they have paid for the right to archive the broadcast indefinitely.
Because some people were not taught that just because you didn't steal physical property it is still stealing and they can not seem to control themselves or their actions some measures must be put into place in order stem the flow of such illegal activity. Technology has given us great wonders but it has also created thieves who may not even realize they should be in jail for what they are doing. -
Originally Posted by ROF
-
Originally Posted by Conquest10
https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?p=1450673#1450673 -
Originally Posted by somebodeez
-
Originally Posted by ROF
Maybe we can put governors on cars that limit the car to the speed lemit. -
Originally Posted by ntscuser
-
Originally Posted by ROF
-
Originally Posted by somebodeez
-
Yeah but those problems are not exclusive to HDTVs. They have been around since the invention of the TV. It hasn't stopped anyone from buying one before. It didn't stop you from buying the TV you own right now.
A - Less functional than what I have now
B - Can't display anything without making it look like very bad quality DivX 3 LM rips
C- Have to worry about burn-in
D- Has screen door, sun spots and rainbow effects
E- Can only watch in a dimmed room (or only watch in a bright room)
F - Can't see the display from the side
G - Will need a $400 bulb replaced every couple of years
H - Will require me to pay someone to calibrate it
I - Has squiggly lines up and down the whole picture
B - Depends on what TV you get. None of mine look awful
C - The TV you have right now is not immune from burn-in either
D - All depends on what TV you want to buy
E - While RPTVs look better in dark rooms, they still look beautiful in well-lit rooms. LCDs only look good in well-lit rooms. No two ways about that.
F - Only a problem of RPTV and LCDTVs
G - Not all
H - Only RPTVs, but not always
I - squiggly lines? LCDs is the only thing I can think of that could do that.
I do not recommend LCDs to be used for a TV, ever.His name was MackemX
What kind of a man are you? The guy is unconscious in a coma and you don't have the guts to kiss his girlfriend? -
Originally Posted by ntscuser
Once they come up w/a model that doesn't have motion artifacts or any of the other issues that I listed and can handle non-HDTV content w/out making it look horrible and prices become sensible and the kind of HDTV content that I want is available, I'll be looking into them.
Mean while, the TVs that I have had for years - which haven't sufferred any of those things, are still alive & kickin' -
Even more sad is some people still believe that if they pay for broadcast television they have paid for the right to archive the broadcast indefinitely.
How dare they steal money from those Hollywood excutives. I mean hollywood excutives are entitled to eat too. I guess with all this rampant piracy going on, those hollywood excutives won't be able to buy a Gulfstream G-IV jet but contiune to use their Gulfstream G-III jet.
When will people learn.
8) -
Originally Posted by MOVIEGEEK
-
Originally Posted by somebodeez
-
Originally Posted by RLT69
Retail stores are not going to stock a massive catalogue of movies that can't play on like 85% of people's tvs, and 99.9999% of peoples dvd players. Give it time. That is exactly what the two camps expect you to do.
Originally Posted by RLT69
Originally Posted by RLT69
Neither at initial launch nor since were DVDs ever released before the VHS. The trend has always been to release the VHS first or to release them simultaneously. VHS get released first in the hopes that people will double dip and buy the better quality DVD later.
Originally Posted by RLT69
Originally Posted by RLT69 -
Originally Posted by RLT69
-
Originally Posted by ROF
-
Originally Posted by adam
For starters, "standard" DVDs (and even VHS/Beta tapes) took advantage of an existing technology -- Television -- and maxed it out for all it was worth. That is, they gave people who had televisions more than what they'd ever had before (e.g. the ability to play anything on demand, anytime, pause, fast forward, repeat, etc). And these technologies (VHS and DVD) made the smart move of being totally incompatible with previous formats. You can't play an LP record on a VHS deck, and you can't play a VHS tape on a DVD player.
Blu-Ray and HDTV are, basically, "containers." Aside from improved picture and sound quality -- which is not due to the formats themselves but to the nature of HDTV, a separate technology -- they offer no features that weren't available before (aside from capacity, and "security" features that do not immediately benefit your average viewer). And -- I think importantly -- the ability to play "standard" DVDs is one of the nails in the "competing" formats respective coffins.
Sure, one can argue that this maximizes "compatibility," whatever that means. But -- so far -- I wouldn't bet any money on a new technology that doesn't really and truly take a leap away from the old one.
Digital cameras aren't compatible with film cameras. LPs aren't compatible with iPods. Even computer makes finally figured out that making new computers compatible with old programs was a loser's game.
The technologies that really take off, require a lifestyle change. Incremental changes are all fine and dandy but when you're talking $$$$$$, nobody's gonna get their knickers in a twist over containers. And HD and Blu-Ray discs are just containers.
DVDs were lifestyle changes. The iPod is a lifestyle change. VHS was a lifestyle change. The Mini-Cooper is a lifestyle change. XBox is a lifestyle change.
HD and Blu-Ray discs are like Tupperware -- awesome containers, but really, I get the same results from Rubbermaid.
EDIT: Forgot to put in my plug for the technologies that I do think are lifestyle changers -- the "Tivo" (or generic digital recorder) and "on-demand" viewing over cable. These give a specific and particular advantage to consumers -- e.g. "I wanna watch this new movie right now!" -- that enhances the experience in ways that make it worthwhile (for many people, I believe) to "switch" or "upgrade." And -- importantly -- because the methods of delivering the majority of HDTV signal for the forseeable future is gonna be over some kind of cable connection, anything that takes advantage of that cable connection (like "Tivo" or similar units, and on-demand digital viewing) and offers the majority of users a more value-added experience, that's where I'd invest my money. -
Neither at initial launch nor since were DVDs ever released before the VHS. The trend has always been to release the VHS first or to release them simultaneously. VHS get released first in the hopes that people will double dip and buy the better quality DVD later.
RLT69 wrote:
The point is - there is a way to push adoption of HD. Make content available in HD and limit content access to HD format only.
Not only is that utterly impractical and economic suicide, but it would also have legal consequences. That would be an Antitrust violation.
As penetration of these tvs increases Blu-ray and HD-DVD will become the predominant media format. This is expected to take several years at least. That is why there is no point in releasing this massive catalogue of older movies now. There is not yet a demand for it and content is not going to create that demand so long as the technology is priced for only the enthusiast, AND it requires most people to ditch their tvs which may still work perfectly well and in a quality that they are happy with. Doubling every existing movie onto one of the HD formats would certainly increase sales of all HD technology, but it would also bankrupt everyone in the process. There is an inherant transition period with first-gen media technology. Its just a fact.
If it's going to take Blu-Ray/HD-DVD 5-8 years to catch on, they may as well drop it. That's too long of a time frame for other technologies to overtake them.
As you pointed out much of this technology is first generation, though it's not marketed to the consumer as such. So, why buy it? If the technology is going to change over time and the content doesn't exist, why am I buying it now? Wouldn't it be smarter for the me to wait until the technology is mature and content is available?
People are happy with DVDs and their current sets. Hell most people aren't even viewing DVDs in 480p, let alone upconverting them to 1080p! There is no compelling reason to adopt Blu-Ray/HD DVD player. That's what the Audioholics article was pointing out. HD is coming, certainly but not necessarily in the Blu-Ray/HD DVD format.
-
Originally Posted by ROF
-
Originally Posted by ozymango
-
Originally Posted by ntscuser
-
Originally Posted by RLT69
VHS and DVD caught on because of market demand, not because companies forced the issue.
HD formats, both televisions and discs, are simply not catching on. It'll be at least another 10 years before it does. By that time, something like HD-DVD and BD will seem like a technological fossil, and it'll be pushed aside like Laserdisc and S-VHS and others.
Whether or not somebody likes HD, it does not change the fact that:
- most televisions are traditional tv sets
- many of these sets are just a few years old with plenty of lifetime left
- that people do not buy things until old ones break (not because something else newer exists)
- that we have 100 years worth of SD content that people prefer, look at how popular re-runs and DVD sales of television shows are
- that regardless of abilities, many DVDs are poorly made by studios (grain, overcompression, etc), including Warner Brothers, Fox and Buena Vista ... people are often angered by this ... unlikely that HD/BD will be any different
- most broadcasting is still not HDWant my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
Extended Director's Cut = Director playing with himself
Example: Blade Runner theatrical release was excellent. In the Director's cut, Ridley Scott eliminated Ford's voiceover and changed the ending effectively ruining what had been an excellent film noire interpretation of a reasonably good sci-fi story.
Example: THX1138 - ruined by George Lucas with added special effects that ruined the continuity of the story's flow; it showed only that Lucas hadn't forgotten how to jerk off on camera.
The only re-cut film I've seen that worked even better than the original was NBC's edited version of The Godfather Saga where they they took parts I and II and re-edited it to play in chronological order. That was brilliant thinking.
Similar Threads
-
Need app solution to play Blu-ray ISO. Top two players failed.
By timmy2 in forum Software PlayingReplies: 4Last Post: 12th Jul 2010, 22:46 -
Blu-Ray & DVD Decrypter vs AnyDVD HD
By gotnotime in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 8Last Post: 8th Aug 2009, 15:37 -
Can I rip Blu Ray Discs with LG Super Multi Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD-ROM Dri
By donpato in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 5Last Post: 5th May 2008, 16:05 -
Apple TV 2.0 vs. Blu-Ray, DVD & HD Cable: The Comparison
By BJ_M in forum Latest Video NewsReplies: 1Last Post: 25th Feb 2008, 09:16 -
blu-ray & hd dvd to h.264 or hdwmv?
By eao1 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 1Last Post: 24th Jan 2008, 22:45