VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Hi everyone

    I have 2 AVI files. One has a bitrate of 2011kbps, a size of 368(w) x 288 (h) and a frame rate of 29.95fps; the other, 902kbps and 640 x 256 and 24.95fps.

    I think the file with higher bitrate, smaller size and higher frame rate, should look better than the other. But when I watched the files, they looked pretty much the same.

    Would someone please help me understand the bitrate (I already read the glossary)?

    Thanks
    Quote Quote  
  2. VH Veteran jimmalenko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Down under
    Search PM
    Bitrate is kilobits per second.

    So mathematically:

    Video 1 has ~ 67kb per frame (~ 106,000 pixels). 0.65 bits per pixel.

    Video 2 has ~ 36kb per frame (~ 164,000 pixels). 0.22 bits per pixel.

    These are just numbers though. Depends on quality of source, type of motion, etc etc. You watching in Full screen ?
    If in doubt, Google it.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Hi jimmalenko:

    Thanks for the info.

    Yes, I am watching both in full screen. One is truely full screen (i.e., originally made for TV); the other, widescreen.

    Both are DivX made from DVD. The higher-bitrate file's codec is DIV3, the lower-bitrate file has XVID.

    Cheers
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member thecoalman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by moviebuff2
    Hi everyone

    I have 2 AVI files. One has a bitrate of 2011kbps, a size of 368(w) x 288 (h) and a frame rate of 29.95fps; the other, 902kbps and 640 x 256 and 24.95fps.
    The first file is using too high a bitrate for that resolution... 2000 is more than sufficient for MPEG1 at that resolution. Divx will produce files of approximate quality as mpeg1-2 at about 1/5th -1/4th the file size. If that video had originally been encoded at 400-500kbps it should look as good as it does now. Additionally your second video has a lesser framerate which requires less data per second. The second one is probably within the datarate range it should be and I'll guess is probably a newer codec which will produce better quality at a lower rate.

    I don't work with Divx so those bitrates I mentioned could be on the low end.So in conclusion your first file is just taking up more disc space than it needs too. One thing to note, if you did a side by side comparison the higher resolution video will produce more detail.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks, thecoalman, for the clarifications.

    I know I can always count on this forum for help.

    Cheers
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!