So in my TMPGnc I have a choice of compresion-AC-3 or linear pcm. Which is better? I'm mainly doing Concert vids & I transfer to a standalone burner then edid w/ TMPG. Thanks,
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
-
ac3 takes less space. It depends on if your original source was encoded in digital surround sound and you wish to keep it that way. If it was stereo only than you won't lose anything by doing pcm. If it was 5.1 and you choose lpcm than you don't get the surround tracks anymore. But pcm takes up a lot more space than ac3.
It depends on how much video quality you want to preserve.Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
So is AC-3 a form of compresion? (like MP3) If so than wouldn't PCm be better sound quality? It's all strait stereo stuff just want it to sound as good as it can. Thanks
-
AC3 is dolby's digital compression system. And not to put to fine a point on it but to quote your own post you said
Originally Posted by slipknotmr
PCM should retain the stereo the best but you'll have to sacrifice some video quality depending on the project size.Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
Originally Posted by slipknotmr
Because if your standalone is recording it in AC3 changing it to LCPM won't make it any better and just use a ton of space that could be used for video.
Most produced dvd's have AC3 audio. 2.0, 5.1. -
Hey Noahtuck, you just answered my question. i just checked & my stand-alone uses AC-3, so AC-3 it is!! Thanks!
Now if someone would just answer my other thread(about how to raise audio levels when reauthoring a dvd) I'd be set for the night!! Thanks again,Mike -
Edit the audio files in an audio editor. It has nothing to do with authoring.
Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
If it's your transfers that need audio raised, some experimentation on the hardware side would be well worth it. To raise levels in an editor, you'd need to convert to WAV, normalize (or limit) the audio, and then either leave the file as PCM (at a cost of space) or reconvert to AC3 (at a sound quality penalty). THEN remux to your video. If you can get better gain staging to your DVD recorder, you needn'e go through all of this.
Similar Threads
-
Non-linear sync issue: a real p.i.t.a.
By Instant Martian in forum AudioReplies: 10Last Post: 26th May 2010, 19:42 -
VLC - How does 'Linear' deinterlacing work ?
By Movie-Maker in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 4Last Post: 2nd Nov 2008, 12:02 -
MiniDV versus non-linear Camcorder
By bowmah in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 9Last Post: 23rd Sep 2008, 01:42 -
Non Linear Editor advice?
By jbigfoot in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 15Last Post: 4th Mar 2008, 00:51