VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. Getting on board with DL Burning. Drive was cheap, wish I could say the same for media.

    It looks like Verbatim is the brand to use. But I have a question.

    Is there really is pro or con's using DVD-R DL over DVD+r DL?

    I newer Pioneer with play DVD+-R without issue. My old Panny A120 (7 years old and still going!) Will only play DVD-R's Would like to have the DL disk play on both.

    I have heard that the DVD-R DL's must burn all of the 1st layer to work. Would that be a problem if I burned an ISO image with ImageBurn? Or a Main Movie Only burned on DL?
    For the love of God, use hub/core labels on your Recordable Discs!
    Quote Quote  
  2. Pretty much sure that most everyone agrees that the main pro to go with DVD+R DL is that most burners by default bitset them to DVD-ROM, making them more compatible with players than DVD-R DL which cannot have its booktype changed.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Freedonia
    Search Comp PM
    I have experimented a little with both formats. You are correct in that the entire first layer of the DVD-DL must be burned for it to work. What happens is that the layer is padded if necessary to fill it out. The only reliable way that I know of to burn DVD-DL is to use PgcEdit to make an ISO and then use ImageBurn. The settings of ImageBurn are a little tricky. There is some setting where it says something like "calculate layer break" or "set layer break manually" and you have to set the layer break manually for DVD-DL. This is very poorly explained in a lot of places. I had to do a web search to find this out. The value 2295104 for the layer break usually is OK for DVD-DL (at least for Verbatim) but one or two guys reported having to use different values because DVD Decrypter reported a different number of free sectors in their discs.
    It has been reported that Nero cannot properly burn DVD-DL, but I can't confirm that. The discs are too expensive to waste on a test with Nero. I like the format less than DVD+DL. My DVD-DL discs have been consistently problematic for my Philips DVP-642 to play. It will play them, but at random points it freezes for a few seconds before resuming play.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    ®Inside My Avatar™© U.S.
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jntaylor63
    I newer Pioneer with play DVD+-R without issue. My old Panny A120 (7 years old and still going!) Will only play DVD-R's Would like to have the DL disk play on both.
    Pretty much what HatchetMan said.
    Except i don't know about "most burners by default bitset them to DVD-ROM" ?
    As alot of burners have to be flashed or use a utility to change the book type.

    But i always use +R because i have set my burners to change the booktype to DVD-ROM.

    My panasonic dvd recorder only records & plays -R, will NOT read or play a DVD+R, but with the booktype changed to DVD-ROM it reads and plays +R & DL+R perfectly!!

    I don't know what kind of burner/s you have but that would be the way to go with +R's.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Then I should calrify. All dual layer burners that I have used, even ones that do not bitset +R, do bitset +R DL, my Pioneer 108 for example, for better compatibility reasons . But, I have seen some that do not and need flashed to a firmware that will. On the upside to that, usually a hacked firmware that bitsets +R DL will also bitset +R as well
    Quote Quote  
  6. My pioneer 108 never bitset and as far as i know Pioneer are unable to bitset at all.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Originally Posted by retiredjoker
    My pioneer 108 never bitset and as far as i know Pioneer are unable to bitset at all.
    Then maybe you have never burned +R DL ( = DUAL LAYER ), or not checked its booktype afterwards ?
    And if you were to happen to flash the 108 with the Piodata firmware, they will bitset +R (Single Layer) as well.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Pocatello, ID
    Search Comp PM
    All the latest Pioneer drives will automatically bitset dual layer discs, even though they don't bitset single layer.
    -Brett
    Quote Quote  
  9. Originally Posted by retiredjoker
    My pioneer 108 never bitset and as far as i know Pioneer are unable to bitset at all.
    it does on +R DL....
    Quote Quote  
  10. Thanks for the info guys.

    How do I change the booktype on my burner to DVD-ROM for DVD+R DL?
    For the love of God, use hub/core labels on your Recordable Discs!
    Quote Quote  
  11. Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    ®Inside My Avatar™© U.S.
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by jntaylor63
    Thanks for the info guys.

    How do I change the booktype on my burner to DVD-ROM for DVD+R DL?
    Well, from what everyone seems to be saying, dual layer burners automaticaly set DL+R's to dvd-rom, i can't say for sure one way or the other as i have never looked into it and i always flash my drives with custom firmware to set the booktype with sinlge layer +R's as soon as i install them.

    If you want to reflash your drive to set even single layer +R's to ROM you can do a search for the firmware, i can't look because i don't have a clue what kind of a burner you have as nothing is listed in your "computer details" and you have not stated what burner you have
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    According to Google search results I found at http://www.bitburners.com/Reviews/Hardware/VSO_DVD_recorder_and_media_reliability_report/ -R is compatible with more players than +R, but +RW is more compatible with more palyers than -RW. From my experience with DVD5 media I've found this to be the true although I've not yet done any DL burning.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!