VideoHelp Forum




Poll: Which is better for encoding MPEG-2 from Avi?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

View Poll Results
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2
FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. 27th Jan 2006 01:49 #31
    lordsmurf
    lordsmurf is offline
    Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    No, like the SD-2000 Scenarist encoder, for example.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  2. 27th Jan 2006 01:56 #32
    DereX888
    DereX888 is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    beautiful
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by manono
    I can't believe I've allied myself with someone who's icon is a girl with jiggling breasts. Hi DereX888.
    WTF, you prefer them boobies saggy and hangin' instead of crispy and jiggling?

    I totally don't understand whatcha talkin' about :P




    look is deceiving!
    Quote Quote  
  3. 27th Jan 2006 02:04 #33
    DereX888
    DereX888 is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    beautiful
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by lordsmurf
    No, like the SD-2000 Scenarist encoder, for example.

    stop it smurf
    You do know well that normal CCE doesn't have noise!
    (i dont know about those 'basic' or trials etc as i have never tried them).
    And since you prefer it - you do know that procoder always soften the output.
    Both are fast, but atm CCE is simply better encoder, whats there to discuss

    There is only one example where i prefer procoder than cce: converting captures of off old vhs tapes, but thats different story
    Quote Quote  
  4. 27th Jan 2006 05:55 #34
    fritzi93
    fritzi93 is offline
    Member fritzi93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    U.S.
    Search Comp PM
    For a hobbyist to buy CCE SP at $2,000 is ridiculous.

    But CCE Basic is only $60, same as Procoder.
    Pull! Bang! Darn!
    Quote Quote  
  5. 27th Jan 2006 06:13 #35
    guns1inger
    guns1inger is offline
    Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    ProCoder Express, perhaps. The full version of ProCoder is somewhat more expensive
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  6. 27th Jan 2006 06:28 #36
    fritzi93
    fritzi93 is offline
    Member fritzi93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    U.S.
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by guns1inger
    ProCoder Express, perhaps. The full version of ProCoder is somewhat more expensive
    Yes. Procoder2 is $500.
    Pull! Bang! Darn!
    Quote Quote  
  7. 21st Feb 2006 19:55 #37
    Chaoji3791
    Chaoji3791 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Search Comp PM
    Also see:

    https://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=95640&highlight=
    Quote Quote  
  8. 21st Feb 2006 21:37 #38
    whitejremiah
    whitejremiah is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    USA
    Search Comp PM
    ease of use, tmpgenc has it....quality, personally i like CCE basic...or if you dont wanna foot any money at all, quenc is decent for what it costs......nada...i haven't really delt with procoder enough to make an informed opinion on it, as the once or twice i did try it (quite some time back) i got some error on the video i was encoding so i just kinda gave up on it......
    Quote Quote  
  9. 28th Feb 2006 08:16 #39
    upshot
    upshot is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Um.... I vote procoder... :P
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!