VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    What are the factors to consider when selecting a mini-dv camcorder? I know I want one with analog passthrough for the purpose of capturing analog onto computer... but aside from that, how does one measure differences in quality among the camcorders in this class? I understand obvious differences in zoom and optical zoom... but as far as quality, is there a benchmark to compare, such as megapiuxels per second, or whatever?
    Quote Quote  
  2. Member daamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Oz
    Search Comp PM
    Hi mjl,

    All your questions, and more, will be answered if you head over to www.camcorderinfo.com

    Happy reading...
    There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.

    Carpe diem.

    If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Not really. There's no really quantifable way to express image quality. Even with still cameras, the megapixel rating is only so useful.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peterborough, England
    Search Comp PM
    Megapixel rating is totally meaningless with video and only has any effect on stills. In saying that, I've yet to see a still taken by a camcorder that even comes close to one taken by a proper digital still camera. Optical zoom is important, digital zoom is a waste and should be switched off the moment you get the camcorder. If quality of video is what you are after, go for a 3CCD camcorder.
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Roughly, quality will track price with MiniDV camcorders and the difference is mostly in the camera section.

    Some issues:
    - CCD quality (size is an indicator for low light performance)
    - 3CCD vs 1CCD
    - quality of the optics
    - pay attention to wide end of the zoom range
    - manual control override of auto features

    Read the detail reviews for the final cut.
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member Baatfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Carol Stream, IL
    Search Comp PM
    Currently, IMHO, the best "bang for buck" quality miniDV cameras are the Panasonic 3CCD models....
    I just bought a GS250 for $640 shipped after a $50 rebate.

    And all I can say is WOW! Broadcast quality for under a grand!

    http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-PV-GS250-Camcorder-Review.htm
    http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-PV-GS150-Camcorder-Review.htm
    http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-PV-GS400-Camcorder-Review.htm
    And they have good support here:
    http://www.pana3ccduser.com/

    Panasonic just announce the new, replacement models...the 180, 280 and 500...and they are not as nice. They've removed some features, like pass through!), to lower cost and so the price is going up on the current ones.

    HTH,
    Bob T.
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member dwill123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by mjl
    What are the factors to consider when selecting a mini-dv camcorder?
    Several things to pay attention to in selecting a mini-dv camcorder:
    1. What will you mostly be shooting: your daughter's dance recital, your son's violin concert, honnies at the beach or your day at Disney World.
    2. What will your lighting conditions mostly be: bright sun or low light
    3. Automatic vs manual control
    4. Film like output (24p)
    5. 4:3 vs 16:9
    6. How much money are you willing to part with to get all of this?

    Be prepared to compromise. Getting everything you want in an affordable model will cost you. That said I must second an earlier recommendation for the Panasonic line. I purchased a Panasonic GS400 in August and I love it. As mentioned before Panasonic just announced their new line of machines and I'm glad I bought when I did. That's not to say that what they're coming out with is bad. I just think the current line is a little more feature rich. Good luck.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member Baatfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Carol Stream, IL
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by dwill123
    I purchased a Panasonic GS400 in August...
    I'm jealous..... :P
    Quote Quote  
  9. Member edDV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern California, USA
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by dwill123
    As mentioned before Panasonic just announced their new line of machines and I'm glad I bought when I did. That's not to say that what they're coming out with is bad. I just think the current line is a little more feature rich. Good luck.
    I hope they don't blow it by reducing features. They need to get aggressive against SONY by adding features and reducing cost to the customer. The 250 -> 280 needs first of all a manual audio level override. Otherwise it makes a fine utility 3CCD camcorder but I just hate AGC audio pumping.

    The GS 400 was a hit and prices went up 25%. They need to fix their manufacturing problem and get the GS 500 back under $1000 or Sony will beat them back.

    I'm pulling for Panasonic to trump Sony just like they did with DVCPro. And I'm a long term Sony camcorder owner back to the 80s (PD-150 and looking for more).
    Recommends: Kiva.org - Loans that change lives.
    http://www.kiva.org/about
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!