VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    Swedich Consumer Organisation has conducted at test of DVD Recorders. As I'm not a subscriber to their service, I don't have all the results, but the tested recorders where:
    • JVC DR-M100SE
      LG DR7400
      LG DR7500
      LG RH7500
      LG RH7800H
      Panasonic DMR-ES10
      Panasonic DMR-EH60
      Philips DVDR33305
      Philips DVDR3330H
      Pioneer DVR-433H-S
      Pioneer DVR-530H-S
      Samsung DVD-R121
      Samsung DVD-HR720
      Sanyo DVR-H200
      Sharp DV-HR450S
      Sony RDR-GX210
      Sony RDR-HX710
      Thomson DTH8043E
      Thomson DTH8045E
    Not very surprisingly the recommendation is to get HDD recorders, where all contenders came in at a score of 4 out of 5, with the exception of Sanyo DVR-H 200 that only got a "3" due to bad audio.
    # 1 was Panny DMR-EH60
    Best bang for bucks was Pioneer DVR-433H-S
    Three players flunked the test:
    LG DR 7400, LG DR7500 and Sony RDR-GX210, the latter becuse of excessively noisy, and lousy picture.
    The test was performed by ICRT, International Consumer research and Testing.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  2. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    Some of those rankings don't even make sense. They give more points to a unit because it has a hard drive? Some people consider that a negative, not a positive. Things like "lousy picture" are useless without detailed reasons and/or examples. I bet this is one of those reviews where the button layout on the remote control, or the chassis color, can earn/reduce points given.

    I still fail to see why reviewing organizations ejaculate in their pants over Panasonics, especially magazines. The picture quality is just not that good, and it's market share has been dwindling severely in the face of competition, both in price and quality. Better machines exist now, and for less cost.

    It's even more screwy when certain LG models get bad image grades, but other LG's do not, and they all have the same imaging system inside. Stupid.

    Seriously, WTF?
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    Like I said, I don't have the full story, but I, for one, would favor a recorder with HDD before one without, all else equal. I'd also favor a recorder that can use all kinds of DVD recordables, which seems to be one of the pro's in the test.
    I don't know where you got the idea that the bad grade LG's got was because of bad picture quality - that was only mentioned for the Sony.

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member rhegedus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    on the jazz
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by mats.hogberg
    # 1 was Panny DMR-EH60
    Not surprised - was it also the most expensive?

    Here in the UK, such magazines have a habit of picking the most expensive models (usualy Panny) as their winner.
    Regards,

    Rob
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member mats.hogberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sweden (PAL)
    Search Comp PM
    No idéa, but it was >700 euro, and that's pretty expensive in my book...

    /Mats
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!