I am trying to convert mpg to a dvd compliant video.
What is the image resolution for TMPGEnc Xpress? When I try to burn a mpg file of 55 mb at 720 X 480 (highest resolution) it becomes an output 377 mb. That is 6.8 times the original. I remember when I used DivxtoDVD it was 120 mb (about twice the size) Here are the other options"
704 X 480
352 X 480
352 X 240
Even if I change the resolution to 352 X 240, it still stay the same at 377 mb output.
I then noticed that the "average bit rate" is at max of 9200 - "used at 7.52% of capacity" If I lower the average bitrate, the the output of 377 mb DECREASES. As I decrease the average bit rate, the % capacity also decreases. Can you educate me on this? What is average?? I think it its says about 25-29 frames per sceond for this mpg, but not sure of average bit rate.
Also, the aspect ratio was set at Pixel 12:11 (PAL 4:3) Will it not run on my USA dvd player since I think it should be Pixel 10:11 (NTSC 4:3)? What happens if I leave it on PAL??? wil it not play?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
-
Originally Posted by jyeh74
So it doesn't matter what resolution you choose, if the running time is the same (which it will be for the same clip) and the bitrate is the same (which it sounds like it was) you'll always get the same filesize (or there abouts).
Originally Posted by jyeh74
Originally Posted by jyeh74
Originally Posted by jyeh74
Hope that helps...There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.
Carpe diem.
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room. -
http://members.dodo.net.au/~jimmalenko/AVI2DVD.htm
Read it.
Do only what it tells you to do - nothing more, nothing less.
Do everything it tells you to do.If in doubt, Google it. -
jimmalenko,
There is no autodetect on average bitrate? The lower the bitrate (thus the longer the clips) does that necessarily mean the lower the quality? How do I know at what point do I reach a bare minimum where I am reducing quality. In other words, how do I know if I should encode and burn 100 mpgs on one dvd-r at say 2000 average bitrate or split it into two dvd-r at 4000 average bitrate EACH? -
All else being equal lowering the bitrate does reduce quality.
To determine at what point your particular video crosses the threshold of unacceptable quality loss the best instrument is your own eyes.
-drjThey that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety.
--Benjamin Franklin -
drjtech,
Well, I would hope that before I spend hours encoding and then burning, I would be able to know what my output is. Plus I am limited on time so I dont have the flexiblity to play around. Any other suggestions? -
I suggest rather than using TMPGenc Xpress, which I assume is making everything so easy for you that you don't really understand what it is doing, that you use plain old TMPGenc and do this manually. Try setting an average bit rate of 6500, a low of about 4000 and a high of 9000, 3 passes, and hopefully you will end up with a nice looking final product. Please note that everything you encode will end up larger than the source unless you use a really low bit rate and don't care about the quality.
PAL may or may not play on any given NTSC DVD player. Many players can convert PAL to NTSC on the fly, but not all. I would not recommend converting the video from PAL to NTSC in TMPGenc. Usually the final results are not good. -
Don't worry about bitrates. Use TMPGENC is single pass Constant Quality mode. Select the quality you like and encode. It's faster (single pass vs 2 passess) and every frame of every video will use only the bitrate necessary to get the quality you specify.
Try quality settings in the 70 to 90 range to see what you like. You only need to encode short segments for testing.
The drawback of course is that you don't know how big the file will turn out. -
In a PM to me, posted here so that all can see the question(s) and answer(s):
Originally Posted by jyeh74
The MPEG files may already be DVD compliant. You might be lucky...
As a rough guide, good quality sources can be encoded to MPEG2 at full D1 resolution (720 x 480 / 576 for NTSC / PAL) at a bitrate of, typically, not less than 5,000kbps. The bitrate is either for CBR, or the average for VBR.
Whereas poorer quality sources can be encoded at half-D1 resolution (352 x 480 / 576) at a bitrate of around 3,000 - 4,000kbps.
You can even encode to a resolution of 352 x 240 / 288 (same as VCDs) - but I've never done this so can't comment on suitable bitrates.
The idea of going to lower resolutions is twofold:
1) A lower resolution softens the image, and so masks (to a degree) the lower quality of the source.
2) You don't need as high a bitrate for lower resolutions, meaning that you can use relatively high bitrates (for that resolution) and so hope to address quality issues, without exceeding the max limit for DVDs.
Why have I told you this? Well, when you get the info on your source files, you can judge how close they are to one of the above and encode accordingly. Unfortunately, the ultimate decision on bitrate and resolution is with you as you are the only one who can see the outcome and judge how acceptable it is. This, by default, requires you to experiment a little...
The thing to remember is GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out. You will never make anything better than it's source - you can only hope, at best, to make it appear to look as good.
Originally Posted by jman98
Also, a min of 4,000 is way too high - a min of 1,000 is much more like it. Why? Because VBR works by allocating bitrate according to what's needed whilst maintaining an overall average (that's why a Max, Min and Average are set).
If a scene doesn't need much, it will go down towards, and as low as, the Min value. Likewise, if a scene needs a lot of bitrate, it will go up towards, and as high as, the maximum.
Now, if it is trying to maintain an average (as it is), having too big a figure for the Min means the encoder can't go as low as what it might get away with, meaning that more bitrate is used than necessary and therefore, because it's aiming for an average, less bitrate is available for scenes that require higher bitrates.
In essence, setting the Min too high is overkill for low bitrate scenes and throttling the encoder on high bitrate scenes.
On top of this, 3-pass VBR could well be unnecessary - not to mention time consuming. Most often, 2-pass VBR is sufficient.
@ jyeh74: I agree with junkmalle's suggestion - try CQ mode. Follow his recommendations on settings, as I', not that familiar with it. However, here are the benefits:
1) Gives a constan quality output.
2) One pass, so isn't time consuming.
The downside is that, as mentioned, you won't know the file size. But I'd say to encode using CQ and fit as many as you can on a DVD, and use as many DVDs as needed.
Phew! There - done. I hope that helps...There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever England: Telstra Stadium, Sydney, 22/11/2003.
Carpe diem.
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.
Similar Threads
-
Should i put average bitrate or max bitrate in 2pass encoding mode?
By tendra in forum Video ConversionReplies: 28Last Post: 11th Nov 2011, 07:38 -
What is max bitrate and max channels supported by PCM audio format?
By Bonie81 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 10Last Post: 18th May 2010, 23:35 -
hanbrake average bitrate
By scarlac in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 12th May 2010, 13:35 -
Most compatible codec, Lossless bitrate, and max bitrate
By sevenlayercookie in forum Video ConversionReplies: 2Last Post: 6th May 2009, 20:43 -
VBR (2 pass, average bitrate) Encoding for DVD-9
By jcm0320 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 15th Aug 2007, 09:44