This weekend I tested the DMR-ES10 and I love it. I was able to record some tapes that were in very bad condition and create a dvd copy that looked at least 10 times better than the original. The noise filters are very good in this unit, I agree with Lordsmurf on the abilities this machine has for pre-processing video. It cleans up video quite nicely.
The color correction filters in this unit really are astounding. Yellowish skin tones are now more of a natural color than the washed out look that we experience using old tapes. Sharpness is another plus that this unit has (which was one of my biggest greviances with the JVC M10).
I did find the unit works well for capturing as long as you don't go into the LP 4hr mode. I never really do, my longest captures are 2 1/2 hours, I've tried a few captures at 3hrs and I still like the quallity. 4hrs presented too much block noise for my taste.
I like the fact that you can finally put a thumbnail in the menuing system. I have to admit that I would've of loved to see motion thumbnails, yet the still images are fine for now.
All-n-all I agree with Zorankarapancev this is by far one of the best machines that Panasonic as put out to date. I don't really have much negative to say other than for the dollar it is hard to beat.
Just my opinion.![]()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 43 of 43
-
Do unto others....with a vengeance!
-
Concerning the Line-in NR--
Automatic: Noise reduction only works on input signal for video tape.
On: Noise reduction works for any input video.
Off: Noise reduction if off. Select when you want to record input as is.
How does the DVD Recorder know if the signal is from video tape? I might also record from a DVD player or from a Digital Cable Box using the A/V outputs. How does it know the difference? I'm hoping that either Automatic or On will clean up the rather fuzzy signal I'm getting on 2 favorite channels, TV Land and TCM. All the news channels seem to come in perfectly.
-
That is a good example for the bad Japanese translation. The better one should be:
- Automatic: Noise reduction automatically detects and eliminates randomly generated noise and color irregularities typical for the videotapes.
- On: Noise reduction is permanently ON for any video input. -
I don't think it only works on tape input signals. The reason I say that is because I had some video clips I downloaded from the internet and the original clips had all sorts of mpeg artifacts. Once I applied the NR feature the video looked much better. Most of the artifacts were gone, and the video looked quite good.
I'm not sure if it had anything to do with the NR setting or the main system filters. I do know that the pixelated noisy mpeg clip looked very good once I recorded it using the ES10.
To make sure it wan't the TV screen that was masking the noise, I took the video I recorded on dvd and played it on the computer and it looked better than the original. Some sort of noise reduction was definately applied.Do unto others....with a vengeance! -
Originally Posted by ejai
I have the ES10 here on my desk. It has one purpose: sync filters. It does really well on unstable tapes, and removes the tearing and smudging artifacts from the video, re-sync's it. That's all it does. And sometimes that can lead to a another artifact, a slight ghosting, but it's the lesser of evils. The ES10 filters are probably TOO STRONG for their own good, as I have seen ghosting on normal recordings. The "noise reduction" is a temporal blur, though slight, but that's about it. Not any chroma noise or grain reduction, that's for sure.
As far as color filtering, or anything like that, there is not any such thing on these units. It exists ONLY on the playback side of things. Most decent DVD recorders and players have "picture modes", usually to tweak contrast and brightness/IRE output.
The perceived "better color" is again, simply a side effect from having a darker image. That's something any photographer is going to know, and is why certain filters are even made. You darken one part of the spectrum, it augments that color to be "darker" and therefore "richer", but the side effect is that it deteriorates contrast and brightness. On a still photo, which will later be corrected for this offset in a darkroom, or Photohop, that's fine. But not on a video recording that has no such later corrections performed. If you want to tweak color, buy a proc amp, $50-75 off ebay, $300+ new. I routintely tweak color, and it always looks better than the source.
Again, ES10, here on my desk. Excellent piece of machinery, just not for recording with. It is a much-needed doctor for those nearly-dead VHS tapes. But I pass the signal on to better equipment, be it a capture card or another DVD recorder.Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
FAQs: Best Blank Discs • Best TBCs • Best VCRs for capture • Restore VHS -
I totally disagree with Lordsmurf in terms of color enhancement, this unit does an excellent job of enhancement of colors. Some of the originals I used were very bland in color and after recording them with this machine the color is more vivid and true to life.
This recorder can be used for filtering but it much more better than that. This machine will please most people.Do unto others....with a vengeance! -
While I certainly agree that the ES10 that I have boosts/emphasizes colors, I don't think its color is true to the orginal image. Mine seems to have a slight red push as well.
Some people will prefer the added color in any case. To each, his/her own...The OldeMan -
Originally Posted by OldeMan
It all depends on what you prefer.
I'll take the red over the green anyday....Do unto others....with a vengeance! -
I must admit that Lordsmurf and Gshelley61 are right about the ES10's noise filtering being subpar.
I recorded a movie that was very grainy using the ES10 and it looked just as bad as the original. I decided to use the JVC M10 instead and the video looked much better. The grainy look was hardly noticeable.
The Panasonic is good for color and 2 1/2hr captures. The JVC does a better job on bad grainy video. My only issue with the JVC is the blurring of the video in order to get a good picture. As stated in another thread this is something you have to live with in order to get a better picture.
I still prefer the Panasonic for the sharpness and color but I do admit that there are some situations where the JVC is a better machine to use.
Thank goodness most of video I capture is much cleaner than vhs.Do unto others....with a vengeance! -
Originally Posted by trhouse
Here's a PDF of their BU2365FV chip.
http://www.rohm.com/products/databook/av/pdf/bu2365fv-e.pdf -
Originally Posted by ejai
-
I think I will give it a try. I know I don't particularly like the softening even when the recorder does it during recording. I find the loss of detail unexceptable. The type of blurring I do like is a more gaussian blurr (smart blurr) similiar to the one I had in an older model vhs recorder I owned. What it did was smooth out the gradient areas, yet it left the sharp areas untouched.
The JVC has the softening feature implemented well, it's lack of a better sharpening process I have a problem with.Do unto others....with a vengeance! -
Hello
I want Panasonic DMR-ES10 only to use it as a sync filters (with s-video in/out between VHS and capture pc card)
My doubt is:
I have video tapes in format PAL-N combo
Do I have problems with this?
thank you for responding....
Similar Threads
-
Panasonic DMR es10 working question
By mammo1789 in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 7Last Post: 24th Mar 2012, 18:02 -
No video displaying Panasonic DMR-ES10
By nocutename in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 2Last Post: 22nd Jul 2010, 06:47 -
Panasonic DMR-ES10 - Audio Quality?
By Kryzon in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 10Last Post: 29th Dec 2009, 19:17 -
Panasonic DMR-ES10 No recording
By TAMMU in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 12Last Post: 22nd May 2008, 22:52 -
DVD-RAM discs causing Panasonic DMR-ES10 recorder to 'fall-over'.
By dreamcloud9 in forum DVD & Blu-ray RecordersReplies: 13Last Post: 6th Mar 2008, 23:24