My new PC will contain a 400gb SATA drive which I shall use for Video work. Should I create a small partition on this for the OS or carry on using the Seagate Barracuda for my OS ?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
Buddha says that, while he may show you the way, only you can truly save yourself, proving once and for all that he's a lazy, fat bastard. -
use the seagate ide foe the os. 7200 rpm drives are comparable in performance. theonly noticable sata boost would come from a raptor 10k drive. i personnaly would partition the os onto 20-25 gig.
-
It is always better to seperate your OS from your other HDs if possible. So if your OS has a problem, and you have to reload it, you have a better chance that you will not lose other data. It is also a lot faster if you encode from one HD to another HD, therefore you do not have to read and write to the same HD. This is the second best way to increase encoding speeds. The best way to a faster CPU.
Some days it seems as if all I'm doing is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic -
Keep in mind that having seperate partitions on the system drive WILL slow performance down.
Your base? Well, they belong to me now... -
Ah, it depends on how you're using the partition. Personally I don't like partitioning drives because I'm lazy. However our Pieces of Crap (or PCs) at work fail regularly and it's nice to have the OS on its own partition so we can repair it and be on our way. If there is a minute performance hit because of this (since the apps are on the same partition on the OS there can't be much of a loss since it's all in the same place on the platters) it is supeceded by the ease of repairing the OS volume when needed.
However in your case I'd just put the OS and apps on the smaller HDD and Ghost an image of that after a clean install as your repair, use the leftover room for more apps or scratch space. Given the massive size of your storage drive I'd even map my "My Documents" folder to the larger SATA drive. I agree that you won't see much difference in performance between the SATA and PATA 7200rpm drives. You may notice a difference if your SATA drive and your board support SATA2's NCQ tech and some of that, but probably not enough to warrant using such a large drive for your boot volume. I actually do the same thing you do, run a smaller (80GB) IDE drive as boot and a larger SATA (250GB) as my storage drive. Additionally I always have at least one scratch drive available as well.FB-DIMM are the real cause of global warming
Similar Threads
-
how to re-anable my sata icon in win xp sp3 (sata drives not visible in DM)
By deejay.2001 in forum ComputerReplies: 7Last Post: 11th Mar 2011, 09:47 -
Replacement for dead Panasonic / Matshita UJ-220S with ATA interface
By Persistence in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 1Last Post: 21st Feb 2010, 09:53 -
Serial ATA hard drives on dvd recorders ?
By joecass in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 2Last Post: 14th Jan 2009, 17:32 -
SATA I cables and SATA II
By HatchetMan in forum ComputerReplies: 5Last Post: 4th Feb 2008, 15:06 -
3 HDDs one PC... two ATA, one SATA
By chewie8008 in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 25th May 2007, 00:14