IDE or SCSI or FireWire??
Thanks
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
SCSI is probably quicker, but to be honest, its processor speed that is the important factor. Hard Drive speed has very little performance impact on encoding.
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binary... -
I doubt that hard drive speed has any bearing on encoding performance - there's no way you'll be encoding faster than 40-50MB/sec. The only way I can see that it might affect encoding speed is when your PC asks for the next chunk of data to be read or written - a slower drive will add a few milliseconds on to the seek time. You stand to lose a few seconds, but that's all.
Basically, it doesn't matter. -
i agree with bugster and Cobra. You need to look at the bottleneck and work from there. A faster processor and more memory will be more beneficial than a faster drive.
-
And more memory does not always increase performance. For instance, Mainconcept shows only small improvement from 256MB to 512MB and effectively no improvement above that. 1GB and 512MB produced identical encode times for me.
It's all about CPU speed.
Similar Threads
-
720p encode 700mb and 720p encode 1.5gb or over 3gb
By ali2k1 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 7Last Post: 26th Aug 2010, 13:09 -
BD rebuilder Shrinking Quicker!!
By titot4u in forum Blu-ray RippingReplies: 12Last Post: 6th Feb 2010, 14:09 -
Hardware needed to convert MKV to AVI and dvd etc quicker?
By spunge85 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 16th Jan 2010, 06:40 -
is there a quicker way to convert xvid?
By samwise2206@aol.com in forum Video ConversionReplies: 4Last Post: 16th Apr 2008, 15:50 -
new hardware
By rallynavvie in forum ComputerReplies: 8Last Post: 20th Feb 2008, 18:43