VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I bought the PAL version of the recently "remastered"<-LOL Stones- Rock and Roll Circus, hoping that the video quality would be better than the original release. Nope. Based on the following stills, any recommendations to 'better' it?



    The only way I can describe the above grain is "swimmy". It moves as though it is a series of big "blobs". Oh, and nice deterioration on the top of the frame, eh? I don't mind some grain, but this stuff is distracting.



    I intend to re-author to NTSC DVD. Do i need to Inverse Telecine as well ? Thanks in advance.

    BTW, the performance by The Who is spectacular.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Yeesh! Why would you want to?

    Quote Quote  
  3. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I agree that the Yoko performances are fast forwards, but there is some cool rock history there. Nice seeing Clapton playing a Gibson ES-335 as well. Anyone know where I can get one of those crochet coats?
    Quote Quote  
  4. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    I made a better version from an NTSC VHS tape, proc amp, JVC VCR, DR-1000 detailer, and did not even need noise reduction.

    That DVD release sucks compared to what I made.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  5. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    I just can't believe they wouldn't do something as simple as crop a tad from the top to reduce the film decay appearance.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Member vhelp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    New York
    Search Comp PM
    I just can't believe they wouldn't do something as simple as crop
    a tad from the top to reduce the film decay appearance.
    Probably to give it, it's originality look. And, also because it was
    probably ruled that any further enhancements would add (worsen) to the
    look. I'm just guessing. But, they probably didn't have the funds,
    must like they have for the first three "ST episodes".
    .
    I'm sure they could have fixed it up a little.

    Oh, and these are probably interlaced, not film. So, no sense on trying
    to apply any IVTC methods. Just encode as Interlace, unless you are
    also hoping to play on your PC

    -vhelp 3265
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    You can listen to the director, Michael Lindsay Hogg, on one of the alternate audio tracks. He mentions the Nagra film canisters were stored in a barn for 20 years and were only discovered after the death of Stones roadie Ian Stewart. Yet The Who documentary 'The Kids Are Alright' has the Rock and Roll Circus performance and that particular movie was released in 1980.
    Quote Quote  
  8. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    An update, ran the file through several (mainly) AviSynth filters, and cropped a tad from the top to mask some of the film damage. Generally, the whole movie looks a whole lot better. Here's a small example:

    Unprocessed:



    Processed with AviSynth plugin FFT3D and VagueDenoiser

    Quote Quote  
  9. Video Restorer lordsmurf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    dFAQ.us/lordsmurf
    Search Comp PM
    I don't see a difference. It only looks like the "processed" one got a shade darker.
    Want my help? Ask here! (not via PM!)
    FAQs: Best Blank DiscsBest TBCsBest VCRs for captureRestore VHS
    Quote Quote  
  10. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    How DARE you ? Yeah, not the best example of before and after. You can see the enhancements in the moving portions - the "swimming" backgrounds are much cleaner. Still room for improvement, but I think the grain is there to stay. Can't remove too much without it looking over processed. I might ask the AviSynth guys at Doom9 to make some suggestions.
    Quote Quote  
  11. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Search PM
    Have you tried DegrainMedian filter in Avisynth?
    It's good at removing grain but it will be a little bit softer after filtering.

    But at normal playback is the noise really annoying on a TV? Denoising too much will make it washed out and "plastic". Well you already said that, it might be overprocessed.

    Most of the time I try denoise filters I end up with getting the best result after compression by using no filters at all...
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member The_Doman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by ronnylov
    But at normal playback is the noise really annoying on a TV? Denoising too much will make it washed out and "plastic".
    Yeah, have to agree with that,
    I always prefer a little noise instead off filtering everything out and make it look unnatural clean and plastic.
    Quote Quote  
  13. Member Soopafresh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Thanks for the suggestions. Yes, I did try DegrainMedian, but it seemed to shave off too much detail. There's a Denoise script posted which integrates several degrainers and denoisers, but the author warns of encodes taking so long they can be clocked on a calendar.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!