VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. I recently upgraded to the pro version because the basic was giving me some sync issues. The pro works perfectly except it take 2 hours to compile!! I have an AMD processor at 1.66 with 512 mb of ram. My hard drive has 30 gb of space. I am pulling my hair out
    Quote Quote  
  2. On my Athlon 3200+ 1gig of ram and compililing from 3 seperate HD's (1 for source material, 1 for temp, and 1 for the output) it takes about 25 minutes to compile a full DVD-5.

    What exactly DVD-Lab is doing that it takes so long I have no idea. But with the slower CPU and only 1 HD I could see this process taking a much longer time.
    Quote Quote  
  3. DVD-Lab takes 12 minutes to compile. The same movie takes 2 hours in the pro version. I have to hard drives. The one I compile on is seperate from system.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    Compiling to the same disk as your source is going to slow you down a lot, as the HDD heads are whipping back and forth reading and writing. I would compile to directory (folder) on your system drive, if you have space. This will speed things up substantially.

    DVD Lab Pro has a new engine, so this could explain some of the difference, but 2 hours seems way too long regardless. I have slightly more ram that you, and alsways compile to a seperate disk to my source, but my CPU is similar (Athlon 1800+) and I take less than 20 minutes to compile a full, multi-title disk.

    What stages seem to take the longest ?
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  5. The muxing takes forever. So should I compile to my system disk or movie source disk?
    Quote Quote  
  6. Always Watching guns1inger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Miskatonic U
    Search Comp PM
    First question - do you have two disks, or one disk with two partitions ? If it is the latter, then this conversation is pointless. Partitions on the same disk give no performance advantage. Get a second disk.

    If they are two physically seperate devices, the compile to your system disk. It won't fix all your problems, but should show some benefit.
    Read my blog here.
    Quote Quote  
  7. I've muxed using both my laptop (512mb) and my desktop (1.25gb) and have noticed that my desktop muxes audio MUCH quicker than the laptop. methinks that muxing is a ram issue rather than a processor issue...my laptop runs 600mhz faster than my desktop and ON PAPER is faster, but the hdd speed and ram size impacts the mux speeds considerably.
    Quote Quote  
  8. I keep trying different things, but I and up quitting the program a quarter of the way through because a half-hour came and went. Is there some settings I should be altering from the original. I am at loss. I'll try up-grading my memory because I really like the program.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!