VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7
FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 195
  1. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    no longer member
    Search Comp PM
    Answer this. Is it threadjacking if its your own thread.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by BJ_M
    ......

    Fascinating....
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member sacajaweeda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Would I lie?
    Search Comp PM
    Is it crankyanking if it's your own crank?
    "There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge, and I knew we'd get into that rotten stuff pretty soon." -- Raoul Duke
    Quote Quote  
  4. Originally Posted by the bomb
    thank you for clearing that up Ripper. I don't know where the worm hole goes but now I know what goes in the worm hole.
    Just trying to bring a little science into everyday life !!



    So -- Taking Einstein's theory of realtivity one step further ...

    If you are on a rocket ship approaching the speed of light and are having sex with a 1st cousin -- are they still a relative??
    Quote Quote  
  5. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    no longer member
    Search Comp PM
    Yes because thats what crankyanking is.
    Quote Quote  
  6. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    no longer member
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Ripper2860
    Originally Posted by the bomb
    thank you for clearing that up Ripper. I don't know where the worm hole goes but now I know what goes in the worm hole.
    Just trying to bring a little science into everyday life !!



    So -- Taking Einstein's theory of realtivity one step further ...

    If you are on a rocket ship approaching the speed of light and are having sex with a 1st cousin -- are they still a relative??
    Yes
    Quote Quote  
  7. Member sacajaweeda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Would I lie?
    Search Comp PM
    But what's that got to do with rocket ships and shagging your cousin?
    "There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge, and I knew we'd get into that rotten stuff pretty soon." -- Raoul Duke
    Quote Quote  
  8. Originally Posted by the bomb
    Yes because thats what crankyanking is.
    A stroll down memory lane ...

    Take out the papers and the Trash ...

    Yankity-Yank. Yank that Crank !!






    Quote Quote  
  9. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    no longer member
    Search Comp PM
    I'm so confused.
    Quote Quote  
  10. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    and here i was trying to throw a little learning at you and all i get is crap ...

    i'll go back and continue my latex web search now ....
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  11. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    Let's do the time warp agaaaain.

    It's just a step the left.....
    Quote Quote  
  12. Member sacajaweeda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Would I lie?
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by BJ_M
    i'll go back and continue my latex web search now ....
    Aaah, yes! Useful, practical knowledge.

    Keep us all posted on your findings, will ya??!
    "There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge, and I knew we'd get into that rotten stuff pretty soon." -- Raoul Duke
    Quote Quote  
  13. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    Maybe you can apply that scientific mind of yours to find some longer lasting latex for Dolly?
    Quote Quote  
  14. Master of Time & Space Capmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO United States
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by sacajaweeda
    Originally Posted by BJ_M
    i'll go back and continue my latex web search now ....
    Aaah, yes! Useful, practical knowledge.

    Keep us all posted on your findings, will ya??!
    I'm sure he'll make it a sticky
    Quote Quote  
  15. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Shadowmistress
    Maybe you can apply that scientific mind of yours to find some longer lasting latex for Dolly?

    for dollys "owner" - kelvar would not be out of place for dolly's most "used parts" ..
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  16. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    no longer member
    Search Comp PM
    Did you have to go and tell Cap that?
    Quote Quote  
  17. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    no longer member
    Search Comp PM
    Will one of the other Mods give BJM a yellow card, look what he did to Capmaster.
    Quote Quote  
  18. Член BJ_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Search Comp PM
    did he make a little booboo on the couch again ? :P
    "Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
    Quote Quote  
  19. Originally Posted by BJ_M
    i meant to comment that anything approching the speed of light in water (see above) would have the same friction as the light encounters . .. i doubt to much that you could get anything going much faster or even close to -- BUT not to far off using a slingshot effect .. ..
    Incorrect.

    Firstly, the concept of "friction" is an inappropriate analogy when thinking of different particles going through the medium.

    For example, a beta particle (travelling through water) that is ejected from an atomic nucleus from fission will have no difficulty going faster than the speed of light in water (though it won't travel very far). While it is travelling at faster than light (in the water), it will emit Cherenkov radiation.

    Let me give you an example/thought experiment.

    Say we accelerate a super dense bullet (e.g., an alpha particle) at up to 0.9c (c = speed of light in vacuum). We then have it hit a body of water. The speed of light in water is about 0.75c. Now, the particle will slow down when it hits the water, but it will not slow down instaneously. There will be a short period of time when it's velocity is between 0.75 to 0.9c (i.e., faster than the speed of light in water). During this time, it will emit Cherenkov radiation.

    Feynman's positrons might be electrons going backwards in time-
    Interesting proposition though one needs to explain why there is the preponderance of matter vs anti-matter. Electrons travelling backwards in time does not explain this. Furthermore, it is difficult to explain entropy as well. That positions are electrons travelling backwards in time is not an accepted hypothesis interesting though it may be.

    Antimatter is created by the combination of quantum mechanics and special relativity discovered by Paul Dirac.
    Eh?

    Paul Dirac's work on a quantum model of atomic theory seemed to predict the existence of a "positive electron". The existence of the positron was confirmed somewhat later making Dirac a hero.

    Many of these early theorists, however, hardly had a good understanding of quantum mechanics though (not surprising since they were CREATING the field).

    Regards.
    Michael Tam
    w: Morsels of Evidence
    Quote Quote  
  20. Knew It All Doramius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    If only I knew
    Search Comp PM
    All I know is that we'll truly see how approaching the speed of light truly affects a physical object when man can travel at or faster than such a speed. When man can send a monkey into space at such speeds and sees that his physical nature has been altered by force of speed, then we'll see what new approach we take towards it. until then, an atomic clock is a fallible mechanical device.
    Quote Quote  
  21. By "we", you only mean "you".

    Sorry, but no one is trying to prove to YOU by your standards (sending monkey at relativistic velocities) that time dilation exists. It is a ridiculous antropocentric experiment of no real value.

    Time dilation has been shown to exist by numerous experiments some of which I have already explained to you.

    The half life of an extremely short lived (i.e., unstable) particle that is the result of high energy collider experiments is not a "mechanical device". The very fact that it "lives longer" the faster we accerate it is pretty much proof for time dilation.

    After all, the null hypothesis that time dilation doesn't exist means that we shouldn't be able to detect these particles at all. Fact: we can detect them and their half life is prolonged by increasing their velocity in a particle accelerator.

    Again: GPS satellites. We are not talking about just taking an atomic clock up into space and coming back down and saying, "gee whizz, they're different!"

    GPS satellites make adjustments to their calculations for the timing of their on board atomic clocks in accordance to the slight amount of time dilation as predicted by general relativity.

    If there is no time dilation, then the GPS satellites are progressively making compounding errors in their calculations and GPS would fail to function at all.

    If the assumption that time dilation doesn't exist is true, then there must be some sort of unknown physical phenomenon that affects all the atomic clocks on all the GPS satellites in exactly the right way such that it precisely counteracts the incorrect adjustments made.

    Sorry, but you just have to accept that time dilation exists and we use its principles in every day technological applications. Your objection is as logical as someone denying that the Earth is round until they can personally take me up in a spaceship and orbit the planet.

    Regards.
    Michael Tam
    w: Morsels of Evidence
    Quote Quote  
  22. Paul Dirac's work on a quantum model of atomic theory seemed to predict the existence of a "positive electron". The existence of the positron was confirmed somewhat later making Dirac a hero.

    Many of these early theorists, however, hardly had a good understanding of quantum mechanics though (not surprising since they were CREATING the field).
    Right, this is called a beta+ particle or e+. Also known as a positron.
    Quote Quote  
  23. Member mcbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by BJ_M
    for dollys "owner" - kelvar would not be out of place for dolly's most "used parts" ..
    Are we seaking about kelvar or kevlar here?
    Gonny no dae that!!
    Quote Quote  
  24. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Hello,

    Originally Posted by capmaster
    Ripper2860 wrote:
    Capmaster wrote:
    sacajaweeda wrote:
    No hydraulics involved with yanking my crank.

    That's a rather frightening thought, actually.
    Not if you use a file and remove the rough edges first


    Cap -- Way to thwart a an blatant "threadjack" attempt by BJ_M !!
    The only one who can fully thwart a mod's threadjack is another mod
    But BJ_M usually takes 2 or 3 of us
    Hey - I can hijack pretty well - does STARWARS mean anything to you???

    And to answer the earlier question - NO it isn't threadjacking if you do it in your own thread

    Kevin
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  25. Knew It All Doramius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    If only I knew
    Search Comp PM
    we can detect a hologram, but it's not a physical thing that exists.
    Quote Quote  
  26. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by Doramius
    we can detect a hologram, but it's not a physical thing that exists.
    Thank you!!!
    Quote Quote  
  27. No Doramius.

    A hologram is a physical thing and it does exist.

    The hologram exists as three dimensional data recorded as interference patterns on a photographic plate -- i.e., it is a physical object. The image is then projected with some form of illumination (i.e., with photons which also exist).

    Sure, the actually projected perceived three dimensional object isn't there but that is somewhat irrelevant isn't it?? Just like the "person" in a photo isn't "actually there" or the my reflection in a mirror isn't "actually there" either. These are simply human perceptual irregularities rather than anything else. Our brains interpret visual stimuli in a "contextual" rather than "literal" sort of way which is why we can see a photo as a photo rather than as a simple piece of paper with a complex array of colours.

    Regards.
    Michael Tam
    w: Morsels of Evidence
    Quote Quote  
  28. Member flaninacupboard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Northants, England
    Search Comp PM
    Originally Posted by vitualis
    No Doramius.

    A hologram is a physical thing and it does exist.

    The hologram exists as three dimensional data recorded as interference patterns on a photographic plate -- i.e., it is a physical object. The image is then projected with some form of illumination (i.e., with photons which also exist).

    Sure, the actually projected perceived three dimensional object isn't there but that is somewhat irrelevant isn't it?? Just like the "person" in a photo isn't "actually there" or the my reflection in a mirror isn't "actually there" either. These are simply human perceptual irregularities rather than anything else. Our brains interpret visual stimuli in a "contextual" rather than "literal" sort of way which is why we can see a photo as a photo rather than as a simple piece of paper with a complex array of colours.

    Regards.
    I see Daoramius hasn't disputed this yet. perhaps he's having trouble identifying his keyboard. maybe it doesn't actually exist.......
    Quote Quote  
Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!