who said Canadian don't have justice :)

[Webster]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=856&ncid=856&e=5&u=/nm/20050127/od_uk_...nada_indecency

"observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police"

Isn't this peeping tom???

[Capmaster]

She alerted her husband, and the couple observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police

They watched him for 10 or 15 minutes? Doesn't sound like they were appalled at all. They're as bad as he is ...he likes to wank in public ...and they like to watch

[Webster]

Can he now (Clark) sue them for violation of his privacy??

[Capmaster]

You can pretty much sue anyone for anything

Big difference though between just suing ...and suing and winning

[Webster]

You can pretty much sue anyone for anything

and win??

[Doramius]

Now if he was jacking off in the window waiting for them to watch him, I could see a possible complaint against him. But again, the woman practically had to open her window, stand on a stool, use a telescope, be hung by a crane, press her face against the man's window, invite the neighbors, and throw a party in order to make it obscene for the public. Dammit, let the guy watch his porn and close your curtains. place a notice in his mail box and I'm sure the next time his curtains will be closed for her to watch the sillouette.90-150 feet is a long distance, but I think close enough not to use binocculars and a telescope.

[Webster]

On a similar note. This one for the British:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1516&ncid=1516&e=2&u=/afp/20050127/od_...n_050127120911

"My wife and I were very shocked but we watched it until the end "

It's kinda amusing......... 8)

[Doramius]

A spokesman for the supermarket urged the couple to return the DVD so the matter could be investigated

He just wanted to watch it. The couple obviously didn;t find it that offensive if they kept watching it. They probably learned a few new techniques too.

[lordsmurf]

"Mrs. S." does not deserve a "right to privacy" here. Her name should be just as visible as his. She's afraid people will find out she likes to watch men jerk off.

Much like Kobe Bryant and Kate Faber. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER.

Why people think they have a right to hide is beyond me, AFTER they have put somebody else in the spotlight. ESPECIALLY when they are acquitted.

[Doramius]

"Mrs. S." does not deserve a "right to privacy" here. Her name should be just as visible as his.

Much like Kobe Bryant and Kate Faber. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER. KATE FABER.

Why people think they have a right to hide is beyond me, AFTER they have put somebody else in the spotlight. ESPECIALLY when they are acquitted.

Agreed. I think the guy should go on a US talkshow and openly say the woman's name.

[Grimey]

I love that title

Masturbating Canadian wins court challenge

[zzyzzx]

"Mrs. S." does not deserve a "right to privacy" here. Her name should be just as visible as his. She's afraid people will find out she likes to watch men jerk off.

[zzyzzx]

[northcat_8]

you know that's not true otherwise cats would be an extinct species.

[ViRaL1]

That's why they have large litters. You think kittens are stillborn by accident.

[northcat_8]

Good thing they have 9 lives otherwise I would be killing off about 3 a day

[Doramius]

If the Vietnamese haven't wiped out the cat population, what makes you think masturbating will.