What do you guys think? The answer could be obvious since Neo:6 has the rear-center channel... but Dolby has had a far longer run when it comes to multi-channel matrixing. Do you think one is better for music and one for Video (like TV or VHS)? Just curious what people think is the better matrixed surround format for stereo sources. Ya dont really seem to ever hear much about Neo:6.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
-
Wow, I guess this topic is not nearly as interesting as I thought it was... heh, my bad.
-
Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
-
Hello,
Can't vote only have 5.1 Dolby and DTS. Just fine for meWhy pay more? I'll probably get one of them whenever this receiver dies or I decide I want more power
KevinDonatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw? -
Dolby prologic IIx has a rear-center channel too.
Rear center channels don't add IMO any dimension to the audio, whatever you use on a stereo souround source! (DTS or Dolby)La Linea by Osvaldo Cavandoli
Similar Threads
-
Dolby Pro Logic vs Dolby Digital?
By therock003 in forum AudioReplies: 17Last Post: 11th Jun 2011, 19:51 -
No Dolby Pro Logic from AC3Machine
By jonghyunchung in forum AudioReplies: 9Last Post: 28th Jan 2009, 14:35 -
Dolby Digital switching to Pro-Logic
By toneystone in forum AudioReplies: 4Last Post: 6th Jan 2009, 06:11 -
A Few Questions About Dolby Pro Logic
By seven_deuce offsuit in forum AudioReplies: 17Last Post: 29th Apr 2008, 15:08 -
How to downconvert Dolby Digital to Dolby Pro Logic II?
By randyharris in forum ffmpegX general discussionReplies: 0Last Post: 2nd Nov 2007, 16:54