VideoHelp Forum




Poll: Which matrixed surround sound format for 2 channel sources do you perfer?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. What do you guys think? The answer could be obvious since Neo:6 has the rear-center channel... but Dolby has had a far longer run when it comes to multi-channel matrixing. Do you think one is better for music and one for Video (like TV or VHS)? Just curious what people think is the better matrixed surround format for stereo sources. Ya dont really seem to ever hear much about Neo:6.
    Quote Quote  
  2. Wow, I guess this topic is not nearly as interesting as I thought it was... heh, my bad.
    Quote Quote  
  3. Member Sillyname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Search Comp PM
    Your miserable life is not worth the reversal of a Custer decision.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member yoda313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Animus
    Search Comp PM
    Hello,

    Can't vote only have 5.1 Dolby and DTS. Just fine for me Why pay more? I'll probably get one of them whenever this receiver dies or I decide I want more power

    Kevin
    Donatello - The Shredder? Michelangelo - Maybe all that hardware is for making coleslaw?
    Quote Quote  
  5. The Old One SatStorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hellas (Greece), E.U.
    Search Comp PM
    Dolby prologic IIx has a rear-center channel too.

    Rear center channels don't add IMO any dimension to the audio, whatever you use on a stereo souround source! (DTS or Dolby)
    La Linea by Osvaldo Cavandoli
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!