VideoHelp Forum




+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. Member chicola's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Outside the Matrix
    Search Comp PM
    I'm totally aware that one should compress a video (DVD or not) to the limit of one's own visual perception. In other words, if it still looks good for me then that's my kind of limit.

    BUT...

    ...most people in these forums talk about the indexes of compression shown by CloneDVD or DVD Shrink as a "certain" measure of quality.

    They say, "don't go lower than 70%", "80%", "90%" or "100%".

    BUT all these compression ratios are dependent on the duration of the movie and the bitrate with which the DVD was encoded in the DVD, by the manufacturer.

    There are originals encoded in 4000/5000 kbps average and others with much higher average rates. Those "talked about" compression limits should be different when deciding on doing further recompressions/transcodings.

    So, having all this in mind, does anyone know of a tool which can give an "absolute" compress index based on bitrate and motion analysis? Any published studies in this area?

    I hope I made myself clear..

    Happy Xmas to all videohelp community.
    "Adopt, adapt and improve!"
    Quote Quote  
  2. Serene Savage Shadowmistress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Controlled Chaos
    Search Comp PM
    I do alot of compressing. I'm not sure I understand your question. If you have a disk that's 4000 kbps and one thats 8000 kbps and you compress them both to 50%, the quality will be the same but the filesize will be different. Are you asking why the filesizes must be different?
    Quote Quote  
  3. VH Veteran jimmalenko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Down under
    Search PM
    Originally Posted by Shadowmistress
    If you have a disk that's 4000 kbps and one thats 8000 kbps and you compress them both to 50%, the quality will be the same but the filesize will be different.
    I'd disagree there. Some movies "compress" much better than others - something to do with the motion vector operations that the transcoders manipulate I believe.
    If in doubt, Google it.
    Quote Quote  
  4. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The bottom of the planet
    Search Comp PM
    It also must be said that the quality of the original source material is a big factor. Those cheapie DVDs of old Marx Brothers or Three Stooges shorts will not respond well to compression unless they have been substantially cleaned up before being encoded. Recent films like the Star Wars prequels, on the other hand...
    "It's getting to the point now when I'm with you, I no longer want to have something stuck in my eye..."
    Quote Quote  
  5. The only practical and quick qualitative test I've ever heard of is DDogg's OPV test - Taking the dumbness out of CCE multipass - Revised 6

    I'm not sure how, or if, this could be adapted to something like a compression ratio in DVDShrink, but it seems like it should provide some guidance. It'd be an interesting exercise.
    Quote Quote  



Similar Threads

Visit our sponsor! Try DVDFab and backup Blu-rays!