I was just wondering what other oses besides windows and mac are out there, and what is worth trying out or not. I already an running linux (topologilinux, a special flavor of Slackware) and really like it. I would like to try BeOS too but the live-cd won't work on Athon XP processors, which is what I have. I wish there was a way to make a live-cd for Athlon XP (or an image install, something that doesn't require repartitioning), maybe from the BeOS Max version. Anyway, if you know of some alternative oses, could you give your opinions and post links for downloads?
Thanks.
Garibaldi
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 41
-
-
XP Home is a cheaper alternative to XP Pro...
-
Originally Posted by Garibaldi
The 2k support cycle is going to expire soon. -
But why would you buy 2000, when microsoft has already stated that certain patches would be xp only, leaving 2k users out?
The 2k support cycle is going to expire soon. -
I was thinking about trying syllable.
As far as dos, what about something with a gui, not all command line? -
Yes, it is an OS.
Here is the link
http://syllable.sourceforge.net/ -
Have you ever heard of or used QXN? If so what do you think (is it worth downloading)?
www.qnx.com
What about ReactOS?
www.reactos.com -
I tried the Syllable live-cd- it would boot up to the GUI and then give an error with network config. The mouse and keyboard wouldn't work. I am now trying the QEMU version.
-
I cannot get my mouse to work in syllable- my keyboard works though. Any ideas on how to get it working?
-
Originally Posted by glockjs
-
im about ready to try a new OS. yeah xp has more features and this and that but it seems they are just pilein more and more on to the point where a big bad new puter cant even rip stuff up like it's supposed to. i wanna see somebody else beat M$ to the punch for 64bit puters. that would be awesome and a good time to take them down.
-
I'm getting ready to try that now. I have the live dvd, but I need to move the dvd drive to my new server. Everything I've read so far looks great.
im about ready to try a new OS. yeah xp has more features and this and that but it seems they are just pilein more and more on to the point where a big bad new puter cant even rip stuff up like it's supposed to. i wanna see somebody else beat M$ to the punch for 64bit puters. that would be awesome and a good time to take them down.
www.slax.org
www.knoppix.net -
Originally Posted by glockjsNothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore.
-
Sun, SGI, IBM SCO and pretty much every other Unix / Linux vendor.
-
Actually I do believe they have a LiveCD version of their Java Desktop (I think that's what it's called). Not sure if that one is 64-bit. They do make Solaris for x86, but I don't think they have a live-cd version. If you burn an image of your drive to DVD, then you don't always have to use live cds. I'll see if I can find the links.
Nothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore. -
I believe this is where you get the Java Desktop. http://jsecom16k.sun.com/ECom/EComActionServlet?StoreId=8&PartDetailId=JDSEI-999CDE9S&...MLoadBalanced=
Solaris 10 is available as an eval at http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/10/Nothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore. -
I believe this is where you get the Java Desktop. http://jsecom16k.sun.com/ECom/EComActio ... dBalanced=
Solaris 10 is available as an eval at http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/10/ -
If I'm not mistaken the Java Desktop is a live-cd. The Solaris install is more than likely an hd install.
Nothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore. -
Solaris with Java Desktop are both hdd-installable, dont work from CD aka LiveCD (minimum install is 5GB hdd space and 1GB of RAM just for Java OS
)
-
Originally Posted by Garibaldi
-
Actually everybody else in the industry beat Intel to 64-bit, MS couldn't really produce a 64-bit system when they're an Intel-only system. Now that Intel and AMD do have 64-bit chips, Linux and FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD have native IA-64 and/or AMD64 support (all of them had at least some support for other 64-bit platforms, so it wasn't a huge architectural change). 64-bit is mainly useful for things like big database servers, which usually couldn't be run on any version of Windows anyway.
QNX is nothing special for a desktop, though there's nothing really wrong with it aside from a lack of software. It's a real-time OS, variants of QNX are often used in embedded control systems.A man without a woman is like a statue without pigeons. -
I dont know about eval. installation, but with 'regular' version you just burn the isos and install the OS on your hdd.
-
IIRC Solaris is Unix, not Linux.
Nothing can stop me now, 'cause I don't care anymore. -
Solaris is not Linux. Solaris is a UNIX variant developed by Sun Microsystems. The primary hardware platform is Sun's SPARC/UltraSPARC processor family, which includes both 32- and 64-bit chips. Solaris is also available for Intel systems (Solaris-x86), but I don't think that has real 64-bit support yet. x86 isn't really an important platform for Solaris, I keep hearing talk about Sun just dropping it altogether.
A man without a woman is like a statue without pigeons.
Similar Threads
-
Running two Operating Systems with one PC?
By neworldman in forum ComputerReplies: 7Last Post: 21st Jul 2010, 18:45 -
Musical Operating Systems (Change Boot Partition)
By greymalkin in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 16th Jun 2010, 11:53 -
What's your primary Operating System?
By freebird73717 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 13Last Post: 26th Aug 2008, 19:26 -
Which Operating System
By Craig Tucker in forum Off topicReplies: 9Last Post: 16th May 2008, 18:52