Hi.
When encoding video/audio with TMPGEnc, it offers 3 possibilities for stereo MP2:
1. Stereo
2. Joint-Stereo
3. Dual channel
- What is the optimum (quality wise), when space is not an issue?
- What are the differences.
Many thanks.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
-
I've wondered about that too - so I went searching the web and found this explanantion.
Stereo has 2 seperate channels, but the bitrate allocation between those two channels changes accordingly to the amount of information there is in each channel.
Joint stereo has 2 channels, but takes advantage of what is common between the channels, so the compression gain is higher.
Two of the most used joint stereo modes are IS (intensity stereo) and M/S (Mid/Side). M/S matrixing computes the sum and the difference of the two audio channels and stores these as two channels. This method is very efficient and is a lossless process, which means the two original channels can be extracted exactly as they were.
Intensity stereo replaces the left and right channels with a single signal plus directional information. This method is lossy and destroys DPL information. This method is only recommended at low bitrates.
Many encoders can use a combination of full stereo and either or both of these methods, deciding which to use on a per-frame basis.
Dual channel has 2 mono-channels, meaning each channel is encoded with half the bitrate of the overall bitrate.
Similar Threads
-
Freeware to mux mpeg-2 (m2v mp2) (NOT TMPGEnc)
By 2397to2997 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 12Last Post: 18th Aug 2010, 15:42 -
I keep losing stereo audio on my stereo bluetooth headphones (vista)
By yoda313 in forum ComputerReplies: 0Last Post: 30th Jan 2010, 09:19 -
Stereo, Joint Stereo or Dual Channel for Audio input type?
By c627627 in forum Capturing and VCRReplies: 1Last Post: 23rd Mar 2009, 09:33 -
TMPGEnc DVD AUTHOR and other movie formats
By loa909 in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 3Last Post: 4th Apr 2008, 05:19 -
Convert mp2 file in TMPGenc
By sdlehman in forum Video ConversionReplies: 1Last Post: 17th Mar 2008, 16:53