Subject line says it all. Is there a reason to run Nortons SpeedDisk vs XP's internal defragmenter ... or is there a better one.
Tim
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 36
-
-
I've always been a Speed Disk fan. I've had every iteration of it since it was a minor add-on to Norton Utilities running DOS 1.5 or so (waaaaay before Windows 3). I've found the following drawbacks to other defrag utilities:
Built-in MS defrag - Doesn't optimize swapfile - options not customizable like files first (like to put swapfile at the very outside edge of HD platter for speed), files last, files at end, certain types at end like .jpg, .avi, etc.
Diskeeper - Slower than the second coming. Not very good interface, custom options limited
Various and sundry freeware apps - Don't optimize swapfile, can't customize options
Speed Disk is the best, IMHO -
Best?
Diskeeper
0&0 Defrag -
Is Speed Disk even available as a standalone product?
I was under the impression that Symantec started bundling it with SystemWorks a couple of years ago. -
Originally Posted by tag
-
I've got Norton Utilities V2002 which has SDisk ... Should work ok with XP.. I'll check online first for bugs with XP.
-
Originally Posted by Dr. DOS
-
Hmmm -- I will have to check online for an evaluation version of SystemWorks
-
Originally Posted by Dr. DOS
-
http://www.oo-software.com/en/products/index.html
O&O is by far the best"Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
NTFS you really shouldn't have to worry
i have heard that said before and it is simply not true -- a NTFS system needs to be defrag'd just like FAT32 IF you want better performace ....
it also helps to rebuild the page file and defrag the MBR (which the better defrag tools here do)"Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
Ditto O&O Defrag. I've used Vopt, Speed Disk and Disk Keeper -- must say I like O&O best !!!
-
The new Mac FS defrags in the background IIRC. That is an awesome feature on machines that have free resources.
I still use Speed Disk as I can tell it where to put things if I want it to. I use a lot of Norton apps as I've never noticed it hog resources like so many have said it does -
Originally Posted by BJ_M
Maybe the pagefile or the reg... but the disk itself???
makntraksIn the theater of the mind...
It's always good to know where the exits are... -
Originally Posted by makntraks
-
yes -- we do it on all our servers and also on the render farms and workstations ..
scheduled routine maintenance <<<--- exactly"Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
you can run o&o in stealth mode for servers -- works excellent ....
o&o is used in a lot of major org's for servers ..."Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
Originally Posted by BJ_MFB-DIMM are the real cause of global warming
-
Originally Posted by Dr. DOS
If you want to check it out, O&O offers a 30 day free trial. -
Originally Posted by Ripper2860
I loaded NU2002 this am and it did work with XP... But I hate all that other crap it loaded. WinDoctor, SystemDoc, whatever... I just want a defrager.... I will check the O&O
** EDIT - Ripper2860, Looks good I just downloaded O&O... tell me, how much resources does the background defragging take up... notice it much?
Thanks Tim -
Originally Posted by rallynavvie
much the same thing i suppose .."Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
So, I installed the O&O product. The drive that was 100% defraged by Norton SD was still 11% defragmented according to O&O. Hmmmm....
Will continue testing ... -
bumping this ...
Wierdity happened after drafragging boot drive a few weeks back.... Microsoft Money (which resides on boot drive) failed to start after running O&O.
Reinstalled program again... not starting ....checked for trojans / viruses.... clean machine.
Had to reinstall OS (it was close to a year so no biggie)
Anyone see anamolies like this from defraging with third party (Norton, O&O, etc) defragers? -
Originally Posted by Dr. DOS
That is strange. I bought O&O and have used it on two different machines several times. I have yet to see anything weird as a result. I also have Money (2005) and haven't had any problems with it failing to start. -
Thanks .... I'm gonna chalk this one up to Murphy. It was good timing on a OS re-install... I was getting DSL set up.
-
very strange - we use O&O on a lot of machines and never had a problem either ...
"Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems." - Rene Descartes (1596-1650) -
I wish I still had the error number.... I didn't even take the time to research it .... just plopped in XP boot floppy and went to town. :P
-
Originally Posted by stiltman
-
I use Raxco Perfectdisk and think it's awesome, used Diskeeper and O&O before but IMO they don't even compare to Perfectdisk.
Similar Threads
-
MKV with Internal Subs ??
By zenzen1 in forum Video ConversionReplies: 3Last Post: 28th Aug 2009, 08:54 -
Internal vs. External ripping
By hardy in forum Newbie / General discussionsReplies: 9Last Post: 27th Jun 2009, 11:32 -
Which of the FOUR internal DVD burners is best ?
By MacPCConsultants in forum DVD & Blu-ray WritersReplies: 40Last Post: 29th Nov 2007, 21:56 -
External x Internal HD
By fjmr in forum ComputerReplies: 7Last Post: 21st Oct 2007, 17:12 -
internal hard drive
By LFC 1304 in forum ComputerReplies: 3Last Post: 4th Jun 2007, 11:37